stevech wrote: > What in the world would drive the need for 5Mbps sustained from an AVR (what > port at 5Mbps anyway) via 802.11? As you may know, '11b at the TCP layer is > 6Mbps; 11g can be faster. > > Well, I am not at liberty to disclose the details. Suffice (I hope) to say that thr wearable electronics will be instrumenting the body movements of a "dancer," whose digitzed movement data will be used to control other aspects f the stage environment for a performance art piece. tom
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] RF data communications headache
2006-03-14 by Thomas Keller