Thomas Keller wrote: > stevech wrote: > >>What in the world would drive the need for 5Mbps sustained from an AVR (what >>port at 5Mbps anyway) via 802.11? As you may know, '11b at the TCP layer is >>6Mbps; 11g can be faster. > > Well, I am not at liberty to disclose the details. Suffice (I hope) > to say that thr wearable electronics will be instrumenting the body > movements of a "dancer," whose digitzed movement data will be used to > control other aspects f the stage environment for a performance art piece. When you consider that useable audio can be encoded at 8kbytes/sec, 5Mbits/sec seems a bit over done just to measure 50 channels of movement.
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] RF data communications headache
2006-03-14 by Russell Shaw