AVR-Chat

1287 analog signals and that many A/D channels that can run in complete
parallelism?

Maybe then, you need a lower sample rate or use delta coding.

Sounds like a pipe dream to me.

-----Original Message-----
From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Thomas Keller
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 5:41 PM
To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] RF data communications headache

Russell Shaw wrote:
> Thomas Keller wrote:
>   
>> stevech wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> What in the world would drive the need for 5Mbps sustained from an AVR
(what
>>> port at 5Mbps anyway) via 802.11? As you may know, '11b at the TCP layer
is
>>> 6Mbps; 11g can be faster.
>>>       
>>    Well, I am not at liberty to disclose the details.  Suffice (I hope) 
>> to say that thr wearable electronics will be instrumenting the body 
>> movements of a "dancer," whose digitzed movement data will be used to 
>> control other aspects f the stage environment for a performance art
piece.
>>     
>
> When you consider that useable audio can be encoded at 8kbytes/sec,
5Mbits/sec
> seems a bit over done just to measure 50 channels of movement.
>   
   1287 channels of sensor data at 12 bits/channel, times 2000 
samples/channel/sec.

tom


 
Yahoo! Groups Links