AVR-Chat

And what will be the size and weight of such circuit?


On 13 Mar 2006 at 19:10, stevech wrote:

> 1287 analog signals and that many A/D channels that can run in complete
> parallelism?
> 
> Maybe then, you need a lower sample rate or use delta coding.
> 
> Sounds like a pipe dream to me.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Thomas Keller
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 5:41 PM
> To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] RF data communications headache
> 
> Russell Shaw wrote:
> > Thomas Keller wrote:
> >   
> >> stevech wrote:
> >>
> >>     
> >>> What in the world would drive the need for 5Mbps sustained from an AVR
> (what
> >>> port at 5Mbps anyway) via 802.11? As you may know, '11b at the TCP layer
> is
> >>> 6Mbps; 11g can be faster.
> >>>       
> >>    Well, I am not at liberty to disclose the details.  Suffice (I hope) 
> >> to say that thr wearable electronics will be instrumenting the body 
> >> movements of a "dancer," whose digitzed movement data will be used to 
> >> control other aspects f the stage environment for a performance art
> piece.
> >>     
> >
> > When you consider that useable audio can be encoded at 8kbytes/sec,
> 5Mbits/sec
> > seems a bit over done just to measure 50 channels of movement.
> >   
>    1287 channels of sensor data at 12 bits/channel, times 2000 
> samples/channel/sec.
> 
> tom
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
>