AVR-Chat

stevech wrote:
> 1287 analog signals and that many A/D channels that can run in complete
> parallelism?
>
> Maybe then, you need a lower sample rate or use delta coding.
>
> Sounds like a pipe dream to me.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Thomas Keller
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 5:41 PM
> To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] RF data communications headache
>
> Russell Shaw wrote:
>   
>> Thomas Keller wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> stevech wrote:
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> What in the world would drive the need for 5Mbps sustained from an AVR
>>>>         
> (what
>   
>>>> port at 5Mbps anyway) via 802.11? As you may know, '11b at the TCP layer
>>>>         
> is
>   
>>>> 6Mbps; 11g can be faster.
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>    Well, I am not at liberty to disclose the details.  Suffice (I hope) 
>>> to say that thr wearable electronics will be instrumenting the body 
>>> movements of a "dancer," whose digitzed movement data will be used to 
>>> control other aspects f the stage environment for a performance art
>>>       
> piece.
>   
>>>     
>>>       
>> When you consider that useable audio can be encoded at 8kbytes/sec,
>>     
> 5Mbits/sec
>   
>> seems a bit over done just to measure 50 channels of movement.
>>   
>>     
>    1287 channels of sensor data at 12 bits/channel, times 2000 
> samples/channel/sec.
>
> tom
>   
   Oops...pardon my sloppy typing.  128 channels, not 1287  *blush*

tom