OK I think we need to split this discussion into 2 sections, those who are using an language for hobby and those who are using a language for work. The reason I say this is like a PCB layout program, hobbyists go for the package with all the included symbols and foot prints, where as professionals tend to generate their own. With C, most pre defined routines have set IO pins etc, but you may not want to have the LCD hanging of Port A etc. The debate so far has revolved around re using code, who says ASM is not reusable ? I find that I can go to an old project, and pull out modules as is needed, and re use them, I have a description block for each module which says what it is called by, what it does, what it expects as an input, what it outputs and what it destroys. There are LARGE amounts of ASM code available on the internet, and it only takes a few minutes to modularise it, so it can be reused later. Regards, Kat. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.618 / Virus Database: 397 - Release Date: 9/03/2004
Message
RE: [AVR-Chat] Re: AVR Compiler: which is the best
2004-03-17 by Kathy Quinlan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.