> > > Correct! Except that the reset rjmp points to it and Start will > evaluate to 0x0000 being the first byte in EEPROM therefore rjmp > will jump to 0x0000 or to itself at infinitum (oh I spoke Latin :) ) As written in the first message, I disagree. I use this form in my own programs, with the reset vector jumping past the vector table, and ISRs, and other stuff, to "Init", which falls through to "main". "Start" is in front of the .eseg directive, and should evaluate to the same address as "Begin" A look at the .lst file will tell, but that's what should be happening. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] why unintialized stack errors?
2007-01-02 by David VanHorn