<Lurk Off!> I'd echo what David says. AVR-Gcc is very good, and its integration with AVR-Studio I find works extremely well for me. I use the STK500, JtagICE-Mk2, AVR-Studio and gcc or asm for my AVR development and I consider this an excellent and extremely cheap combination. (Oh and someone here recommended a CleverScope, which has also changed my life!). FWIW I have a couple of boards that use the Mega168/88 and I've recently decided to do all development with the M32 and probably modify my boards to use it. I don't use the extra code or I/O (yet) but Jtag development is superb, and DebugWire is not. Mark </Lurk On> David Kelly wrote: > > > Yeah, all I've heard is hyperbole. Avr-gcc is very good. What it is not > is an integrated IDE, nor a hand-holding Visual Studio-like collection > of pre-written libraries. > > I looked into IAR and CV a couple of years ago and spent the next 9 > months *very* pleased with avr-gcc. >
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] I Need A Compiler
2007-01-25 by Mark Nowell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.