I haven't used DW now for a few months but my memory is that you can't program with DW and can't have both ISP and DW enabled at the same time, so the program/debug cycle isn't exactly seamless. Whereas the Jtag program/debug cycle is seriously quick and completely seamless. I find this difference means I make much more rapid progress with Jtag. However, my DW experience was based on M168 in a target board - I'd be pleased to discover it's not always such a pain. I agree about the 4 pins but that's part of my thinking in moving to the M32 for development - the cost of the 4 pins is more than offset by saved development time. Mark John Samperi wrote: > At 09:19 PM 25/01/2007, you wrote: > >> Jtag development >> is superb, and DebugWire is not. >> > > What exactly is not so superb with DW? :) I use JTAG, DW and > (now rarely) the old ICE200 and can't tell the difference as far > as debugging is concerned. Sure DW is still newer that JTAG and > may have a few things to iron out but I have been using the Dragon > in DW mode for the M88 and Tiny2313 in several projects for the past > 6 months and I find it SUPERB :). > I hope they put it into the M8515, the M8535 and anything else that > it can be put into. I find the loss of 4 I/O lines annoying with JTAG. > > >
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] I Need A Compiler
2007-01-26 by Mark Nowell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.