kernels_nz wrote: > I can only agree with REB, I find Codevision VERY good, and no, ive > never tried to compile structs, enums or unions that are local to > functions. All the code examples you showed will compile fine when > making those statements global. > > Ive also not met many "real world" programmers that are too concerned > with enums or unions, structs I use a bit just to tidy up code. I > guess were all C-Noobs. Luckily we can make "real world" product work > reliably even when our compiler is so terrible that it can even deal > with a local union. > > hahaha whatever. It is unbelievable how anyone can accept that from something that calls itself a C compiler. Such a "feature" is bone-headedly easy to put into a compiler that it should've been there from the start. I've written a few compiler-like programs and compiler generator tools. I reported these problems multiple times when i had the full licence. Apart from having to remember these stupid limitations, it makes a shitload of unneccessary work to port a significant amount of code from other compilers. > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Roy E. Burrage" <RBurrage@...> wrote: >> It could be, Russell, that the rest of us didn't want to get involved >> with this silliness. Just because a program will not compile one >> project doesn't mean that it won't do a passable, even an exemplary, job >> for most of what an individual wants to do. However, that being stated, >> I don't use anything but assembler on a microcontroller and none of my >> projects are very complex, being just data acquisition, control and test >> automation. >> >> I also use Windows and in something on the order of 6 years of using XP, >> it's only locked up on me 1 time...and that was when a virus got in the >> system. >> >> Stop trying to pick a fight or start an argument.
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: I Need A Compiler
2007-01-31 by Russell Shaw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.