The performance of an antenna depends on its relative size compared to the operating frequency. I would not expect a 900MHz Yagi to work very well at 450MHz. You can make a very simple antenna called a "J-pole" out of 300 ohm twin lead and some coax (to connect to the radio). You can hang it from a tree branch or almost anything that gets it up in the air. Here is a web site that tells how to build one: http://www.qsl.net/wb3gck/jpole.htm Simply scale it inversely with frequency. This design is nominally centered at 146MHz. FRS band center is about 467MHz. So, multiply all of the length dimensions by 146/467). Jim On Thu, 3 May 2007 12:21:28 -0700 (PDT) kholt@sonic.net wrote: > > Thanks, all, for the advice. I probably will try the > Maxstream > devices, although the freq. might be a bit high for my > steep terrain. > The FRS devices are around 450Mz, and just barely work, > at about 100mw. > I haven't tried a directional antenna with the FRS, but I > have a yagi > that works well for our old analog cell phones (900mhz). > Ken > > > Probably not legal per US FCC Part 19 for Ham Radio (I > am a licensee). > > > > You should be able to get that half-mile easily with a > pair of 1W > > 902-928MHz serial port extender radios. I've used > these. And a small > > yagi for one or both isn't expensive if you need its > gain. Maxstream > > sells these - as 100mW and 1W. I don't recall what the > FCC Part 15 > > limit is in that band; it's usually much higher with > highly > > directional antennas. And higher yet for freq. hopping > radios as are > > the Maxstream. These kind of radios are popular in in > the SCADA > > business - telemetry of traffic signals, water pumps, > electrical > > transformers and the like. > > > > I got 6 miles line of sight with a pair of 100mW radios > and 4 ft. long > > yagis, and with 2MHz bandwidth with 1+ Mbps data. The > ones I mentioned > > above for serial port extension (like 19.2Kbps or so) > would do much > > better due to the lower modulation rate and 1W. You can > save some $ by > > purchasing a PC board without enclosure and power > supply. > > > > steve > > > >> > >> On Wed, 2 May 2007 14:30:59 -0700 (PDT) > >> kholt@... wrote: > >> > > >> > I am also looking for a cheap, simple, low power RF > >> > system > >> > that might as well be AM. I need to send > intermittent > >> > telemetry > >> > over 1/2 mile of wooded hills, where there is not > much RF > >> > noise > >> > at the low end. I am looking for low freq because > of the > >> > hills, > >> > but would not like to be bothered with very long > >> > antennas. > >> > The data at either side of the link is handled by > AVR > >> > micros, > >> > and is mostly sensor info: water levels, > temperature, > >> > etc. > >> > I have been experimenting with FRS radios, just > because > >> > they're > >> > cheap and off the shelf, but they are pretty high > freq. > >> > > >> > Ken > >> > > >> > > >> > > Well, yes, but.... > >> > > > >> > > That "transmitter" would have been almost as > "dirty" as > >> > the > >> > > old spark-gap guys in the early days. Harmonics > would > >> > be > >> > > horrendous. > >> > > > >> > > Now, you CAN do it at low frequencies using > function > >> > > generator techniques to generate low distortion AM > sine > >> > > waves (up to 5MHz, perhaps). > >> > > > >> > > Receivers are more difficult because you need to > >> > > discriminate between the signal you want and the > many, > >> > > many, signals you do not want. Think AM broadcast > >> > stations > >> > > as a simple but almost ubiquitous example. > >> > > > >> > > However, if the original query is about VHF or UHF > >> > where > >> > > there are many fewer interfering signals (except > for > >> > those > >> > > really strong TV and FM stations and cellphones > and > >> > FMRS > >> > > radios and mobile 2-way radios and ....), its > almost > >> > > interchanged. > >> > > > >> > > You CAN use a very low sensitivity receiver so > that you > >> > > only hear relatively strong signals (such as a low > >> > power > >> > > transmitter) that is relatively close. The > transmitter > >> > can > >> > > rely, to some degree, on transmission-line > resonators > >> > (and > >> > > thus not use coils in the strictest sense). > >> > > > >> > > So, what might be done depends on so many things. > The > >> > > original poster needs to help us with more > description > >> > > about the requirements (range, type of > information, > >> > > information bandwidth, etc). > >> > > > >> > > Jim Wagner > >> > > Another RF Engineer on the list > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, 01 May 2007 20:04:30 -0000 > >> > > "kernels_nz" <kernels@...> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Zack, > >> > >> > >> > >> Cant say I fully agree, I cant recall the exact > >> > detail, > >> > >> but I have > >> > >> built a voice-AM transmitter without any coils, I > went > >> > >> something like: > >> > >> > >> > >> Buy a 4-pin crystal oscillator outputting square > waves > >> > at > >> > >> the > >> > >> frequency of carrier your looking for, I believe > mine > >> > was > >> > >> 1MHz, then > >> > >> vary the supply voltage depending on the "voice" > input > >> > >> voltage. > >> > >> > >> > >> Cheers > >> > >> Hein B > >> > >> Auckland, NZ > >> > >> > >> > >> --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, Zack Widup > <w9sz@> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > It can't be done. You will need a coil at least > for > >> > >> your > >> > >> antenna/matching. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > How much power are you talking about? What > range do > >> > >> you want to cover? > >> > >> > For what purpose? What frequency? What are > the > >> > laws > >> > >> in your country > >> > >> > regarding license-free transmissions on that > >> > frequency? > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Inquiring minds want to know, especially this > RF > >> > >> engineer. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Zack > >> > >> > > >> > >> > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, azza eldessoky wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > please friends,can any one send me a circuit > >> > design > >> > >> for AM > >> > >> transmitter or receiver without any coils . > >> > >> > > thanks alot > >> > >> > > azza > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > The Think Different Store > >> > > http://www.thinkdifferentstore.com/ > >> > > For All Your Mac Gear > >> > > > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------- > >> The Think Different Store > >> http://www.thinkdifferentstore.com/ > >> For All Your Mac Gear > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- The Think Different Store http://www.thinkdifferentstore.com/ For All Your Mac Gear ---------------------------------------------------------------
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: AM transmitter or receiver
2007-05-03 by Jim Wagner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.