At 06:04 PM 6/13/2007 -0700, mago Umandam wrote: >Yes, what i need ti accuray. Well, i opted higher resolution since the >voltage im measuring is of high range 0-80 V. i assume higher resolution >will give better accuracy. Bad assumption. To get higher accuracy you need a lot more than higher resolution. To get 16 bit accuracy you need to get your noise, sensor accuracy, reference voltage and probably power supply stability to better than 1 part in 65536. This is a non trivial exercise. If you can define what you actually need a little better perhaps an easier approach can be suggested. For instance do you really need to cover the full 0-80 or perhaps a subrange? would a log scale work? Robert http://www.aeolusdevelopment.com/ From the Divided by a Common Language File (Edited to protect the guilty) ME - "I'd like to get Price and delivery for connector Part # XXXXX" Dist./Rep - "$X.XX Lead time 37 days" ME - "Anything we can do about lead time? 37 days seems a bit high." Dist./Rep - "that is the lead time given because our stock is live.... we currently have stock."
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] 16 bit ADC
2007-06-14 by Robert Adsett
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.