Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Thread

RE: [AVR-Chat] Re: STK500, STK501 & AVR Studio not a complete environment

RE: [AVR-Chat] Re: STK500, STK501 & AVR Studio not a complete environment

2004-04-25 by Paul Curtis

Hi,

> > As for a compiler, I find GCC code to be unsuited to
> > the AVR
> 
> What about gcc do you find unsuitable for the avr?

The fact is unifies the two stacks; the entry/exit code for a function
is particularly unappealing.

--
Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd http://www.rowley.co.uk
CrossWorks for MSP430, ARM, and (soon) Atmel AVR processors

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: STK500, STK501 & AVR Studio not a complete environment

2004-04-25 by erikc

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Paul Curtis" <plc@rowley.co.uk>
To: <AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 07:24
Subject: RE: [AVR-Chat] Re: STK500, STK501 & AVR Studio not
a complete environment


> Hi,
>
> > > As for a compiler, I find GCC code to be unsuited to
> > > the AVR
> >
> > What about gcc do you find unsuitable for the avr?
>
> The fact is unifies the two stacks; the entry/exit code
for a function
> is particularly unappealing.

Can you explain this, perhaps with an example?

> Paul Curtis

Erikc  - firewevr@airmail.net
///
"An Fhirinne in aghaidh an tSaoil."
"The Truth against the World."
        -- Bardic Motto
/// Wanted: Will trade illusion of safety for slightly used
governmental system w/ checks and balances.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.