Wireless recommendations
2009-01-20 by Dean Claxton
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC
Thread
2009-01-20 by Dean Claxton
Hi all, I'm looking for recommendations as to a suitable wireless technology that will allow data to be transmitted over distances up to 400m. Baud rate not a problem. It will be used outdoors around a Quarry site. Any thoughts? Zigbee? Standard 433MHz stuff? Dean [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2009-01-20 by Philippe Habib
Check out the B&B catalog. They've got whatever you need. It sounds like you're looking for small numbers so you may as well buy it instead of building it. http://www.bb-elec.com/
On Jan 19, 2009, at 8:53 PM, Dean Claxton wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for recommendations as to a suitable wireless technology > that > will allow data to be transmitted over distances up to 400m. > > Baud rate not a problem. It will be used outdoors around a Quarry > site. > > Any thoughts? > > Zigbee? Standard 433MHz stuff? > > Dean > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
2009-01-20 by Mat Tubb
I use Aerocomm radio modems good for much greater distances. regards Mat Tubb Airship Solutions Pty Ltd http://www.airship.com.au/ Ph: 1300 791 068 Mb: 0415 150 414
-----Original Message----- From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dean Claxton Sent: Tuesday, 20 January 2009 3:54 PM To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Subject: [AVR-Chat] Wireless recommendations Hi all, I'm looking for recommendations as to a suitable wireless technology that will allow data to be transmitted over distances up to 400m. Baud rate not a problem. It will be used outdoors around a Quarry site. Any thoughts? Zigbee? Standard 433MHz stuff? Dean [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2009-01-20 by stevech11
Look at Digi.com - 900MHz $150 per radio with enclosure. XBee at 2.4GHz or 900MHz in a box or as a bare module: not as robust, but OK if you have line of sight or nearly so. --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Dean Claxton" <deanclaxton@...> wrote: > > Data rate is not an issue - 1kbps is more than enough in this instance. > Basically it will be running remote warning signals. > > Dean > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:26 PM, dlc <dlc@...> wrote: > > > If you are outside and line of site Zigbee modules are good for that > > distance if they use the higher power amp outputs (XBee Pro for > > example), they are only a data rate of about 250Kbps however. > > > > DLC > > > > > > Dean Claxton wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'm looking for recommendations as to a suitable wireless technology that > > > will allow data to be transmitted over distances up to 400m. > > > > > > Baud rate not a problem. It will be used outdoors around a Quarry site.
> > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > Zigbee? Standard 433MHz stuff? > > > > > > Dean > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------- > > Dennis Clark TTT Enterprises > > www.techtoystoday.com > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > -- > Kind Regards > Dean Claxton > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
2009-01-20 by Dean Claxton
I stumbled across the Radiometrix NiM2T and NiM2R - priced at approx US$70 for the pair - seems reasonable and claim up to 500m range. Looks fairly simple to integrate - any thoughts? Dean On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Mat Tubb <mtubb@airship.com.au> wrote: > I use Aerocomm radio modems good for much greater distances. > > regards > Mat Tubb > Airship Solutions Pty Ltd > http://www.airship.com.au/ > Ph: 1300 791 068 > Mb: 0415 150 414 > > -----Original Message----- > From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com <AVR-Chat%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto: > AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com <AVR-Chat%40yahoogroups.com>] On > Behalf Of Dean Claxton > Sent: Tuesday, 20 January 2009 3:54 PM > To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com <AVR-Chat%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [AVR-Chat] Wireless recommendations > > Hi all, > > I'm looking for recommendations as to a suitable wireless technology > that > will allow data to be transmitted over distances up to 400m. > > Baud rate not a problem. It will be used outdoors around a Quarry site. > > Any thoughts? > > Zigbee? Standard 433MHz stuff? > > Dean > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > -- Kind Regards Dean Claxton [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2009-01-20 by dlc
If you are outside and line of site Zigbee modules are good for that distance if they use the higher power amp outputs (XBee Pro for example), they are only a data rate of about 250Kbps however. DLC Dean Claxton wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for recommendations as to a suitable wireless technology that > will allow data to be transmitted over distances up to 400m. > > Baud rate not a problem. It will be used outdoors around a Quarry site. > > Any thoughts? > > Zigbee? Standard 433MHz stuff? > > Dean > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > -- ------------------------------------------------- Dennis Clark TTT Enterprises www.techtoystoday.com -------------------------------------------------
2009-01-20 by Dean Claxton
Data rate is not an issue - 1kbps is more than enough in this instance. Basically it will be running remote warning signals. Dean On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:26 PM, dlc <dlc@frii.com> wrote: > If you are outside and line of site Zigbee modules are good for that > distance if they use the higher power amp outputs (XBee Pro for > example), they are only a data rate of about 250Kbps however. > > DLC > > > Dean Claxton wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm looking for recommendations as to a suitable wireless technology that > > will allow data to be transmitted over distances up to 400m. > > > > Baud rate not a problem. It will be used outdoors around a Quarry site. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Zigbee? Standard 433MHz stuff? > > > > Dean > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------- > Dennis Clark TTT Enterprises > www.techtoystoday.com > ------------------------------------------------- > > > -- Kind Regards Dean Claxton [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2009-01-20 by Roy E. Burrage
You might check out the current edition of Circuit Cellar Ink, Dean. It's dedicated to wireless communication. REB Dean Claxton wrote:
> I stumbled across the Radiometrix NiM2T and NiM2R - priced at approx US$70 > for the pair - seems reasonable and claim up to 500m range. > > Looks fairly simple to integrate - any thoughts? > > Dean > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Mat Tubb <mtubb@airship.com.au> wrote: > > >> I use Aerocomm radio modems good for much greater distances. >> >> regards >> Mat Tubb >> Airship Solutions Pty Ltd >> http://www.airship.com.au/ >> Ph: 1300 791 068 >> Mb: 0415 150 414 >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com <AVR-Chat%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto: >> AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com <AVR-Chat%40yahoogroups.com>] On >> Behalf Of Dean Claxton >> Sent: Tuesday, 20 January 2009 3:54 PM >> To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com <AVR-Chat%40yahoogroups.com> >> Subject: [AVR-Chat] Wireless recommendations >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm looking for recommendations as to a suitable wireless technology >> that >> will allow data to be transmitted over distances up to 400m. >> >> Baud rate not a problem. It will be used outdoors around a Quarry site. >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> Zigbee? Standard 433MHz stuff? >> >> Dean >
2009-01-20 by David Kelly
On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:19 PM, Dean Claxton wrote: > I stumbled across the Radiometrix NiM2T and NiM2R - priced at > approx US$70 > for the pair - seems reasonable and claim up to 500m range. > > Looks fairly simple to integrate - any thoughts? Its radio so when claiming 500m range where 400m range is required day in day out, 500m isn't enough. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
2009-01-20 by David Kelly
On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:01 PM, Mat Tubb wrote: > I use Aerocomm radio modems good for much greater distances. I second that. Name has changed in the last year, at least in the Mouser catalog. Now going by their parent company's name, Laird Technologies. Starter/development kit: $200 http://www.mouser.com/Search/Refine.aspx?Keyword=814-SDK-AC4424-200 http://www.mouser.com/catalog/636/6.pdf Might prefer to buy the modules pre-packaged, $325/pair: http://www.mouser.com/catalog/636/7.pdf -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
2009-01-20 by David VanHorn
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Dean Claxton <deanclaxton@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for recommendations as to a suitable wireless technology that > will allow data to be transmitted over distances up to 400m. The nordic NRF(whatever) chips do pretty well. Last time I tested them with monopoles, I got good data at those sorts of ranges. Sparkfun and RFDigital carry good modules for them.
2009-01-20 by Enki
On 20 Jan 2009 at 8:07, David VanHorn wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Dean Claxton <deanclaxton@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm looking for recommendations as to a suitable wireless technology that > > will allow data to be transmitted over distances up to 400m. > > The nordic NRF(whatever) chips do pretty well. Last time I tested > them with monopoles, I got good data at those sorts of ranges. > Sparkfun and RFDigital carry good modules for them. > Linx: http://www.linxtechnologies.com/ Their products seems interesting. Mark Jordan