Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Thread

RE: [AVR-Chat] PIC and JTAG-ICE (was Re: ATmega88 ???)

RE: [AVR-Chat] PIC and JTAG-ICE (was Re: ATmega88 ???)

2004-06-17 by Paul Curtis

Hi,

> > If you have a PIC that is roughly equivalent to the ATmega64, would
> > you consider running my Dhrystone benchmark and telling us 
> the result?
> 
> If I ever have the opportunity, I don't now.
> 
> > > JTAGICE coupon with their seminars ...
> > 
> > That still makes it $200, right?
> 
> It sounded to me like it was free. Probably because they came 
> out with an mkII version that handles more of their chips.

The mkII is not compatible with Mk I (I have both).

>   I have developed a "clone" of the 
> > JTAG-ICE which I would like to sell in the $40 to $50 range.

Olimex do the same.  www.olimex.com.

> I'm miffed Microchip stopped supporting their ICD 1. I wanted 
> to use some cheap little 16F88 and 16F7x7's, but I'll have a 
> look at Atmel's offerings. I notice Atmel has a document 
> (doc2524.pdf AVR060: JTAG ICE Communication Protocol) 
> detailing the communication between AVR Studio and the 
> dongle. If only Microchip would do the same...

Unfortunately, the JTAG ICE Mk II protocol differs from the Mk I
protocol.  I hear that Atmel are unwilling to release the protocol
document covering the Mk II, but this is yet to be confirmed.

--
Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd http://www.rowley.co.uk
CrossWorks for MSP430, ARM, and (soon) Atmel AVR processors

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.