RE: [AVR-Chat] PIC and JTAG-ICE (was Re: ATmega88 ???)
2004-06-17 by Paul Curtis
Hi, > > If you have a PIC that is roughly equivalent to the ATmega64, would > > you consider running my Dhrystone benchmark and telling us > the result? > > If I ever have the opportunity, I don't now. > > > > JTAGICE coupon with their seminars ... > > > > That still makes it $200, right? > > It sounded to me like it was free. Probably because they came > out with an mkII version that handles more of their chips. The mkII is not compatible with Mk I (I have both). > I have developed a "clone" of the > > JTAG-ICE which I would like to sell in the $40 to $50 range. Olimex do the same. www.olimex.com. > I'm miffed Microchip stopped supporting their ICD 1. I wanted > to use some cheap little 16F88 and 16F7x7's, but I'll have a > look at Atmel's offerings. I notice Atmel has a document > (doc2524.pdf AVR060: JTAG ICE Communication Protocol) > detailing the communication between AVR Studio and the > dongle. If only Microchip would do the same... Unfortunately, the JTAG ICE Mk II protocol differs from the Mk I protocol. I hear that Atmel are unwilling to release the protocol document covering the Mk II, but this is yet to be confirmed. -- Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd http://www.rowley.co.uk CrossWorks for MSP430, ARM, and (soon) Atmel AVR processors