Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Thread

parallel eeprom for signal pattern generator

parallel eeprom for signal pattern generator

2009-07-21 by magzky02

Good day to everyone.

I am going to make a signal pattern generator. initilly, i am using a serial eeprom to store data, an AVR controller and an SRAM. Upon power up the AVR read data from serial eeprom and pass to the SRAM. Then run a frequency counter on SRAM address to create a signal pattern.

If i remove the serial eeprom and AVR, change the SRAM with parallel EEPROM, will there any problem in read cycle? Datasheet for AT28C040 says endurance is 10 000 cycles. This means 10 000 read and write? so if i write once and read 1 million times is OK? Just need some inputs from experienced guys.

regards,
mago

Re: [AVR-Chat] parallel eeprom for signal pattern generator

2009-07-21 by David VanHorn

> If i remove the serial eeprom and AVR, change the SRAM with parallel EEPROM, will there any problem in read cycle? Datasheet for AT28C040 says endurance is 10 000 cycles. This means 10 000 read and write? so if i write once and read 1 million times is OK? Just need some inputs from experienced guys.


Serial or parallel makes not difference, the wearout is only on writes.
You can read pretty much forever.

-- 
There is no computer problem which cannot be solved by proper
application of a sufficiently large hammer.

Re: [AVR-Chat] parallel eeprom for signal pattern generator

2009-07-21 by John Samperi

At 01:06 PM 21/07/2009, you wrote:
>if i write once and read 1 million times is OK?

Yes.

Regards

John Samperi

********************************************************
Ampertronics Pty. Ltd.
11 Brokenwood Place Baulkham Hills, NSW 2153 AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9674-6495       Fax (02) 9674-8745
Website  http://www.ampertronics.com.au
*Electronic Design * Custom Products * Contract Assembly
********************************************************

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.