Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Thread

RE: [AVR-Chat] Looking at doing a datalogger using an XMEGA part - not sure which storage technology to use

RE: [AVR-Chat] Looking at doing a datalogger using an XMEGA part - not sure which storage technology to use

2010-02-02 by Tim Mitchell

----Original Message----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dave
McLaughlin Sent: 02 February 2010 11:58 To:
AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [AVR-Chat] Looking at
doing a datalogger using an XMEGA part - not sure which
storage technology to use  

> This all seems to be a grey area and there is no definite
> answer on their 
> website. In fact, it is impossible to determine if you
> need this just to 
> have the hardware present. I have no plans to show any
> kind of reference to 
> SD in my product or even have external access to it and I
> can't find any 
> information as to whether I need a license or not?

They are trying to get you to join so I suppose it's not in their
interests to make it clear!!

If you google a bit there seems to be a consensus that no license is
required if you use basic SPI to access the card as there is no patent
covering this. The license/patents appear to cover a proprietary method
of accessing the card. I have no way of verifying this information.

I guess you have to decide if you are prepared to run the (small) risk
of them coming after you for possible patent infringement.

-- 
Tim Mitchell

Re: [AVR-Chat] Looking at doing a datalogger using an XMEGA part - not sure which storage technology to use

2010-02-04 by Dean Claxton

Ok thanks guys,

I too plan just to use it for internal storage - it would not be accessible
to the end user without opening the case. Download would most likely me via
USB, but it seems the the XMEGA's dont feature USB.

Perhaps I should start looking at the AVR32 as the external memory bus would
also allow the use of SRAM as an option.

Dean

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Tim Mitchell <tim@sabretechnology.co.uk>wrote:

> ----Original Message----
> From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dave
> McLaughlin Sent: 02 February 2010 11:58 To:
> AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [AVR-Chat] Looking at
> doing a datalogger using an XMEGA part - not sure which
> storage technology to use
>
> > This all seems to be a grey area and there is no definite
> > answer on their
> > website. In fact, it is impossible to determine if you
> > need this just to
> > have the hardware present. I have no plans to show any
> > kind of reference to
> > SD in my product or even have external access to it and I
> > can't find any
> > information as to whether I need a license or not?
>
> They are trying to get you to join so I suppose it's not in their
> interests to make it clear!!
>
> If you google a bit there seems to be a consensus that no license is
> required if you use basic SPI to access the card as there is no patent
> covering this. The license/patents appear to cover a proprietary method
> of accessing the card. I have no way of verifying this information.
>
> I guess you have to decide if you are prepared to run the (small) risk
> of them coming after you for possible patent infringement.
>
> --
> Tim Mitchell
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
Kind Regards
Dean Claxton


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [AVR-Chat] Looking at doing a datalogger using an XMEGA part - not sure which storage technology to use

2010-02-04 by Mike Payson

Do you specifically need features that the XMega's provide? If not, you
might consider the largely overlooked ATMega32u4 or one of the AT90U series,
which all have onboard USB. They are pretty slick parts. The only minor
issue with them is that neither of the two big parts suppliers to hobbyists
in the US, Digikey or Mouser, carry them. AVNet does, though, and they have
a better price to boot.

http://avnetexpress.avnet.com/store/em/EMController/Microcontroller/Atmel/ATMEGA32U4-AU/_/R-8738618/A-8738618/An-0?action=part&catalogId=500201&langId=-1&storeId=500201

<http://avnetexpress.avnet.com/store/em/EMController/Microcontroller/Atmel/ATMEGA32U4-AU/_/R-8738618/A-8738618/An-0?action=part&catalogId=500201&langId=-1&storeId=500201>Oh,
the only other issue may be that it isn't available in a DIP.Sounds like
that won't be an issue for your needs, but worth being aware of.

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Dean Claxton <deanclaxton@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok thanks guys,
>
> I too plan just to use it for internal storage - it would not be accessible
> to the end user without opening the case. Download would most likely me via
> USB, but it seems the the XMEGA's dont feature USB.
>
> Perhaps I should start looking at the AVR32 as the external memory bus
> would
> also allow the use of SRAM as an option.
>
> Dean
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Tim Mitchell <tim@sabretechnology.co.uk
> >wrote:
>
> > ----Original Message----
> > From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dave
> > McLaughlin Sent: 02 February 2010 11:58 To:
> > AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [AVR-Chat] Looking at
> > doing a datalogger using an XMEGA part - not sure which
> > storage technology to use
> >
> > > This all seems to be a grey area and there is no definite
> > > answer on their
> > > website. In fact, it is impossible to determine if you
> > > need this just to
> > > have the hardware present. I have no plans to show any
> > > kind of reference to
> > > SD in my product or even have external access to it and I
> > > can't find any
> > > information as to whether I need a license or not?
> >
> > They are trying to get you to join so I suppose it's not in their
> > interests to make it clear!!
> >
> > If you google a bit there seems to be a consensus that no license is
> > required if you use basic SPI to access the card as there is no patent
> > covering this. The license/patents appear to cover a proprietary method
> > of accessing the card. I have no way of verifying this information.
> >
> > I guess you have to decide if you are prepared to run the (small) risk
> > of them coming after you for possible patent infringement.
> >
> > --
> > Tim Mitchell
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Kind Regards
> Dean Claxton
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: AVR and USB

2010-02-04 by Dave McLaughlin

Hi Dean,

 

If you are doing your own boards and have a spare UART available, just use
one of the FTDI USB devices. Every time I have used one of these it just
works. I have read about people having so many issues getting USB in the AVR
to work and for me is just now worth the time or hassle. I have used them
with both USB powered devices and without. You can either use the COM PORT
driver or you can use the DLL and have a slicker control to the device.

 

Regards

Dave.

PS.. For those who might complain that I hijacked this thread, I have not. I
have simply changed the subject so that the content is much clearer. See
below that I am replying to the original posters message!
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Dean Claxton
Sent: 04 February 2010 08:52
To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] Looking at doing a datalogger using an XMEGA part -
not sure which storage technology to use

Ok thanks guys,

I too plan just to use it for internal storage - it would not be accessible
to the end user without opening the case. Download would most likely me via
USB, but it seems the the XMEGA's dont feature USB.

Perhaps I should start looking at the AVR32 as the external memory bus would
also allow the use of SRAM as an option.

Dean





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [AVR-Chat] Looking at doing a datalogger using an XMEGA part - not sure which storage technology to use

2010-02-04 by Roland Jollivet

I don't know how the prices compare, but how about using a Ramtron device
for storage?

Roland

www.ramtron.com


On 4 February 2010 03:51, Dean Claxton <deanclaxton@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> Ok thanks guys,
>
> I too plan just to use it for internal storage - it would not be accessible
> to the end user without opening the case. Download would most likely me via
> USB, but it seems the the XMEGA's dont feature USB.
>
> Perhaps I should start looking at the AVR32 as the external memory bus
> would
> also allow the use of SRAM as an option.
>
> Dean
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Tim Mitchell <tim@sabretechnology.co.uk<tim%40sabretechnology.co.uk>
> >wrote:
>
>
> > ----Original Message----
> > From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com <AVR-Chat%40yahoogroups.com>
> > [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com <AVR-Chat%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf
> Of Dave
> > McLaughlin Sent: 02 February 2010 11:58 To:
> > AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com <AVR-Chat%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: RE:
> [AVR-Chat] Looking at
> > doing a datalogger using an XMEGA part - not sure which
> > storage technology to use
> >
> > > This all seems to be a grey area and there is no definite
> > > answer on their
> > > website. In fact, it is impossible to determine if you
> > > need this just to
> > > have the hardware present. I have no plans to show any
> > > kind of reference to
> > > SD in my product or even have external access to it and I
> > > can't find any
> > > information as to whether I need a license or not?
> >
> > They are trying to get you to join so I suppose it's not in their
> > interests to make it clear!!
> >
> > If you google a bit there seems to be a consensus that no license is
> > required if you use basic SPI to access the card as there is no patent
> > covering this. The license/patents appear to cover a proprietary method
> > of accessing the card. I have no way of verifying this information.
> >
> > I guess you have to decide if you are prepared to run the (small) risk
> > of them coming after you for possible patent infringement.
> >
> > --
> > Tim Mitchell
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Kind Regards
> Dean Claxton
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [AVR-Chat] Looking at doing a datalogger using an XMEGA part - not sure which storage technology to use

2010-02-23 by Dean Claxton

Looking into this a little further, it seems that the AVR32 (specifically
the AVR32UC3A3) has an SDIO interface as well as high speed USB, with DMA
transfer between these peripherals. That is looking to be a fairly
economical choice, though I need to look into it  little further.

The best I could theoretically get with the XMEGA is the SPI bus speed of
16MHz (assuming system clock at 32MHz), which would be around 2MBps, and
that is best case - in reality it would be less. The AVR32 natively supports
the full 4 bit mode SDIO and with the higher clock speed of the AVR32
it should be significantly faster? I'm trying to find some real world
examples that give me a realistic idea of read/write speeds to/from SD and
USB with the AVR32.

Also planning to use the Venus GPS chip - anyone have any experience good or
bad with this GPS?

Otherwise the XMEGA A1 looks like it would be awesome for a datalogger with
8 timer channels, 16 12bit AD convertors, and lots of highly configurable IO
ports. The only limiting factor would be the transfer speed from SD card to
USB (using say the FTDI FT245R for USB). If transferring a theretical 2GB of
data, that could take a long time. Does anyone have any suggestions as to
how that could be sped up - maybe using an FPGA to handle the USB download?

On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Roland Jollivet
<Roland.Jollivet@gmail.com>wrote:

> I don't know how the prices compare, but how about using a Ramtron device
> for storage?
>
> Roland
>
> www.ramtron.com
>
>
> On 4 February 2010 03:51, Dean Claxton <deanclaxton@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Ok thanks guys,
> >
> > I too plan just to use it for internal storage - it would not be
> accessible
> > to the end user without opening the case. Download would most likely me
> via
> > USB, but it seems the the XMEGA's dont feature USB.
> >
> > Perhaps I should start looking at the AVR32 as the external memory bus
> > would
> > also allow the use of SRAM as an option.
> >
> > Dean
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Tim Mitchell <tim@sabretechnology.co.uk
> <tim%40sabretechnology.co.uk>
> > >wrote:
> >
> >
> > > ----Original Message----
> > > From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com <AVR-Chat%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com <AVR-Chat%40yahoogroups.com>] On
> Behalf
> > Of Dave
> > > McLaughlin Sent: 02 February 2010 11:58 To:
>  > > AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com <AVR-Chat%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: RE:
> > [AVR-Chat] Looking at
> > > doing a datalogger using an XMEGA part - not sure which
> > > storage technology to use
> > >
> > > > This all seems to be a grey area and there is no definite
> > > > answer on their
> > > > website. In fact, it is impossible to determine if you
> > > > need this just to
> > > > have the hardware present. I have no plans to show any
> > > > kind of reference to
> > > > SD in my product or even have external access to it and I
> > > > can't find any
> > > > information as to whether I need a license or not?
> > >
> > > They are trying to get you to join so I suppose it's not in their
> > > interests to make it clear!!
> > >
> > > If you google a bit there seems to be a consensus that no license is
> > > required if you use basic SPI to access the card as there is no patent
> > > covering this. The license/patents appear to cover a proprietary method
> > > of accessing the card. I have no way of verifying this information.
> > >
> > > I guess you have to decide if you are prepared to run the (small) risk
> > > of them coming after you for possible patent infringement.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Tim Mitchell
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Kind Regards
> > Dean Claxton
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>  Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
Kind Regards
Dean Claxton


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.