Bascom-AVR
2005-03-30 by Ben Zijlstra
Hello from Holland I would like to react on the Bascom-question. Give me any C program and I rewrite it in Bascom-AVR. Some routines even more tight then C. Have done so with a lot of programs for AVR's and Ethernetcontrollers, no problems yet. So, I agree with Joe Torelli, Bascom is running well. You can check my homepage, Bascom-examples, to see what I am talking about. BTW, Visual Basic doesn't generate ASM so why do you expect it from Bascom? About the maillist, there is a forum and you can access it at www.mcselec.com Have fun (C, Asm or Bascom).... Ben Zijlstra http://members.home.nl/bzijlstra Message: 6 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:46:55 -0600 From: "joseph torelli" <joetorelli@intergate.com> Subject: RE: bascom and fastavr I have used Bascom for a while now. It has worked well for me. There is a Bascom list on yahoogroups. Joe Torelli Mansfield, Texas
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Geo [mailto:buggies@blueyonder.co.uk] >>>Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 10:05 AM >>>To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com >>>Subject: [AVR-Chat] bascom and fastavr >>> >>> >>>Hi, >>> >>>Is anyone aware of the current status of these two compilers? >>>The Bascom mailing list search function at >>>http://www.grote.net/bascom/index.html has >>>never worked for me but this compiler seems to have been updated more >>>recently (Dec >>>2004) than fastavr (21 Feb 2004). >>>I have tried the demo versions - but both have bugs. Fastavr produces >>>assembler code >>>with labels so I can (eventually) trace the problems - but Bascom >>>produces only hex/obj >>>and requires disassembly before I can even start to find why the inbuilt >>>routines don't >>>work. >>>I would appreciate any comment on either compiler (don't bother advising >>>me to use c :-) >>> >>> >>>Geo >>> >>> >>> >>>Yahoo! Groups Links >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>