Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Thread

cellular chips/modules

cellular chips/modules

2007-04-06 by David McNab

Hi all,

I'm looking around at the available chips/modules for cellular network
access, particularly gsm/gprs.

One desired feature is the ability to control a device via SMS text
messages. Another feature is the ability to make a regular TCP
connection from the internet, and reach the device via the cellular GPRS
network.

So far, my search for the simplest/cheapest devices has come up with one
main candidate - the TelIT GM862-QUAD-PY, a python-scriptable GSM/GPRS
module with built-in SIM card socket, which talks AT commands over
CMOS-level RS232, and can also perform voice telephony. Described at:
- http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=279
- http://www.telit.co.it/product.asp?productId=96
Price is moderate - US$140 - but I baulk a bit because it's way above
the price of entry-level cellphones.

Has anyone tried the GM862? If so, how has it performed for you?
Otherwise, can anyone recommend anything else a bit more 'bare bones',
for cheaper?

Looking to hook it up to an ATmega-based board.

Cheers
David

Re: [AVR-Chat] cellular chips/modules

2007-04-07 by Michael Haisley

Sprint has a nifty module that is designed for oems, go to
developer.sprint.com for more info, ì believe a few of the other cell
providers offer similar solutions, most speak rs232.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On 4/6/07, David McNab <rebirth@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking around at the available chips/modules for cellular network
> access, particularly gsm/gprs.
>
> One desired feature is the ability to control a device via SMS text
> messages. Another feature is the ability to make a regular TCP
> connection from the internet, and reach the device via the cellular GPRS
> network.
>
> So far, my search for the simplest/cheapest devices has come up with one
> main candidate - the TelIT GM862-QUAD-PY, a python-scriptable GSM/GPRS
> module with built-in SIM card socket, which talks AT commands over
> CMOS-level RS232, and can also perform voice telephony. Described at:
> - http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=279
> - http://www.telit.co.it/product.asp?productId=96
> Price is moderate - US$140 - but I baulk a bit because it's way above
> the price of entry-level cellphones.
>
> Has anyone tried the GM862? If so, how has it performed for you?
> Otherwise, can anyone recommend anything else a bit more 'bare bones',
> for cheaper?
>
> Looking to hook it up to an ATmega-based board.
>
> Cheers
> David
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Re: [AVR-Chat] cellular chips/modules

2007-04-07 by Thomas Keller

David McNab wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking around at the available chips/modules for cellular network
> access, particularly gsm/gprs.
>
> One desired feature is the ability to control a device via SMS text
> messages. Another feature is the ability to make a regular TCP
> connection from the internet, and reach the device via the cellular GPRS
> network.
>
> So far, my search for the simplest/cheapest devices has come up with one
> main candidate - the TelIT GM862-QUAD-PY, a python-scriptable GSM/GPRS
> module with built-in SIM card socket, which talks AT commands over
> CMOS-level RS232, and can also perform voice telephony. Described at:
> - http://www.sparkfun .com/commerce/ product_info. php?products_ 
> id=279 <http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=279>
> - http://www.telit. co.it/product. asp?productId= 96 
> <http://www.telit.co.it/product.asp?productId=96>
> Price is moderate - US$140 - but I baulk a bit because it's way above
> the price of entry-level cellphones.
>

     Well, of course it is.  You're looking at purchasing one unit.  If 
you were a Cell phone manufacturer, [purchasing such ICs in 100,000 or 
greater QTYs, I thihnkn you'd find the pricing far more palatable.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.