Hi John One does not need invest a large amount of resources into a PIC development kit. I built a programmer and downloaded free software off the net. I maybe spent 15 USD? About the same for the AVRs. Jeri -----Original Message----- From: john <jmahoney@...> To: ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:18:46 -0000 Subject: [ComputerVoltageSources] Re: Microprocessors in analog modules --- In ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Chang" <gchang@...> wrote: > ... > Hopefully, if this group succeeds, we may see many encarnations of > devices that utilize microprocessors in dedicated duties in modules - > not just programs that utilize generalized interfaces that we need to > reprogram each time that we go to do something. ... Yes, indeedy! Having said that, just because the PSIM-1 is reprogrammable doesn't mean that you can't dedicate it to certain functions. One question is, how much [extra] does it cost for this programmability? This raises what I see as the big decision: Which microprocessor to use? I've been programmaing for over 25 years but I admit to confusion over the array of MPUs available. PICs, Basic Stamps, AVRs, BasicATOMs, oh my! One major factor that I see is this: Is a development kit required to program the MPU? I gather that PICs are really cheap but they require a dev kit/programmer. The BasicATOMPRO needs no such kit but it costs much more than a typical PIC. One has to decide (i.e. make a guess at) how many of these puppies s/he will be using. If the answer is a very small number then the no-dev-kit units are more attractive. Beyond a certain number, though, and the dev kit pays for itself. This is why cheap little PICs are great for production devices (including small volume "cottage" production); one programming device yields many programmed PICs. Of course there's also the performance issue. The BasicATOMPRO blows away the PIC, there. I'm as confused as ever. ;-) -- john Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [ComputerVoltageSources] Re: Microprocessors in analog modules
2006-03-06 by laxt57@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.