My $.02 on this..... I decided not to take on the PSIM as a product due to the RS232 issue. It does not make business sense to make a music product that does not have USB and Mac compatibility. The Atom Pro is also very expensive. It does make sense for dedicated hobbyist use. I suspect someone will eventually put together a Basic solution that makes sense in today's market. Michael A. Firman wrote: > > As mentioned here before, I've had really good results with a cheap > USB-Serial connector > and VirtualPC running on OSX (my iMac). A USB interface would be nice > but it sounds > like much too much work for this package. I am looking for a nice > (inexpensive) USB > connected EPROM programming solution since I've had much less success > with a > USB-Parallel connector and my current burner/software (a Needham > EMP-10 and their > very old DOS software. Although I must add that the DOS software works > fine in > VirtualPC but it just can't see the USB-Parallel port). > > --- In ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, "John Loffink" > <jloffink@...> wrote: > > > > The Basic Atom Pro is based upon the Renesas 3664 processor. Basic > Micro > > wraps the 3664 processor with standard hardware port assignments, a > BASIC > > library and programming tools to provide the solution. > > > > Without hardware or BASIC library support for USB, adding USB is not so > > easy. It requires adding a device like a Cypress CY7C68001 USB > Interface, > > which only comes in surface mount packages. It requires an added > parallel > > interface from the BASIC ATOM PRO, pins that we don't have, so a > bridging > > solution is needed, such as I2C to Parallel I/O. The other option is an > > integrated RS-232 to USB bridge, but why build something in that is > > available off the shelf? > > > > Clearly we should keep the RS-232 interface and keep any USB bridges or > > interfaces external to the CVS. > > > > For those without RS-232 ports, buying a 1999-2000 era Intel based > laptop is > > an inexpensive option. These will run Windows 98 and have an RS-232 > port. > > I have one around just for that purpose, purchased for $75 from the > local > > school surplus store. > > > > John Loffink > > The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site > > http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com > > The Wavemakers Synthesizer Web Site > > http://www.wavemakers-synth.com > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com > > > [mailto:ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of (i > think you > > > can figure that out) > > > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 3:23 AM > > > To: ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com > > > Subject: [ComputerVoltageSources] Re: USB vs. RS-232 > > > > > > I guess i have to do more reading - i was (possibly incorrectly) > > > assuming you were still usig the basicatom pro - is this an > > > incorrect sassumption? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > * Visit your group "ComputerVoltageSources > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ComputerVoltageSources>" on the web. > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > ComputerVoltageSources-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:ComputerVoltageSources-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -- Regards, John Blacet Blacet Research http://www.blacet.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [ComputerVoltageSources] Re: USB vs. RS-232
2006-04-15 by John Blacet
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.