I don't think that the project is dead - but it was just bearly alive in the first place. The reason why guys like Dave became interested in the PSIM was because the device actually EXISTED. I don't know if one could have twisted so many able people's arms to participate if it was just a discussion about 'what could exist.' gc "drmabuce" <drmabuce@...> wrote: > > Hi Dave > i've never been sanguine on the commercial prospects for this kind > of gadget, even on a small scale. So i don't blame you at all for > resolving to cut your losses. At the risk of seeming presumptuous , > given your expertise and insight i'm sure that your interest in the > subject will abide, and will of course always be welcome here. For > myself, i'm grateful for your collegiality and your generosity in > sharing it. > > -doc > > > > --- In ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, "djbrow54" <davebr@> > wrote: > > > > So here is my summary of the situation. There have been only 8 > > individuals responding to my original email. Two agreed with me, and > > two suggested different options / configurations so we'll have a total > > of 6 user who want different configurations. I'll predict that half > > will drop out later due to the high cost and complexity. The 100% > > software compatibility with the PSIM was a neat goal, but there really > > isn't even a developer community for it. > > > > The issue is that this is a pretty complex module and everyone wants > > something slightly different. The 'power' in a module like this is > > sufficiently large user community all supporting the development of > > usable software. That isn't going to happen. There just aren't > > enough people interested. The schematics aren't the issue; it's > > arriving at a common set of features to attract enough people for > > critical mass for software development and economic feasibility. > > > > Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. As to the labor of love comment, > > I know. I have 1188 lines of source programmed into 20 processors for > > a really neat display processor sitting on my desk next to me. Now > > I'll withdraw for something more productive ... > > > > Dave > > >
Message
Re: Lurking contributions
2007-02-03 by Gary Chang
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.