ComputerVoltageSources

I'm not going to rejoin the 'features' discussion but just a comment 
on the multiple synchronization need.  I documented some of this on my 
website including replacing a resonator with a crystal (not for the 
faint of heart) and using external I/O to synchronize multiple 
modules.  One needs to be a master and the others slaves.  I updated a 
program for Gary to try and haven't heard yet.  I personally favor 
using backchannel serial communication to synchronize the modules.  I 
put a video of this on the site as well.

Best wishes for agreeing on a set of features.  I second the projected 
BOM costing.

Dave

--- In ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, Dave Manley <dlmanley@
...> wrote:
>
> djbrow54 wrote:
> > 1. Decide on a group consensus for the feature set. 
> I've been lurking on this group since I first became aware of it and 
the 
> PSIM delivery debacle.  I think this point of Dave's is crucial to 
> moving forward.   It would be interesting to restart the project, 
> treating it like any other development project:
> 
> 1. get a feature list, let everyone propose what they'd like to see 
in 
> this project
> 2. prioritize the feature list in a democratic manner
> 3. get consensus on the features that are in and out. formalize into 
a 
> requirements doc
> 4. propose an implementation
> 5. get a projected bom cost.
> 6. if you get this far and people are willing to commit - divide up 
the 
> work appropriately.
> 
> If nothing else, it would be interesting to see all the features 
that 
> are proposed. For example, Gary Chang needed the ability to 
synchronize 
> multiple devices - a need that wasn't originally foreseen.  What 
other 
> "must have" features are missing? 
> 
> -Dave
>