I really do appreciate all of the info. I saw this post on sonicstate and it really did not make sense to me. However on some of my patches i do get a stange low "note" on key release and i have to chop the release on the filter and vca short to get rid of it. I am still not quite sure why ths is happening. I feel the person that posted this incorrect statement was having a similar issue. Ill let you know if I can figure it out. If you know what I am talking about and how to fix it so i can have the note decay, please let me know. Cheers --- In DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com, "ski_ex5tech" <ex5tech@e...> wrote: > No offense to whomever made the claim at SonicState, but that just > doesn't sound right. If the analog oscillators switched back to > their lowest possible frequency immediately upon release of a key, > you'd hear it clearly with any patch that had a finite (non zero) > release stage in the envelopes. You'd also hear it with any "keyless > drones" (patches in which both the amp and the filter are open > without hitting a key). I have a LOT of patches like these, and I've > NEVER heard this behavior. It would render the Evolver next to > useless. > > I have a good guess as to what is confusing the person that made this > claim, though... > > When using the sequencer: > > - IF you program one or more "rests" for any of the sixteen steps, > > - and IF sequencer track 1 is used to control the pitch of one or > more oscillators, > > - and IF the envelopes have a long enough release segment, > > you can hear the oscillators (ANY and every analog and/or digital > oscillator whose pitch is controlled by track 1) return down to > whatever pitch is programmed in the patch as the "home key", if you > will. This is normal behavior, because the sequencer step in track 1 > on which you programmed a rest can't tell the oscillator(s) to play > at the pitch that you want (the pitch of the previous step in the > sequence). > > If you're experiencing this, and it's a problem for you, it's quite > easy to work around. Simply avoid the use of sequencer track 1 to > control pitch of the oscillators when you have programmed rests in > track 1, coupled with long envelope releases. Use tracks 2, 3, > and/or 4 to do all the pitch work. > > Actually, this same phenomenon would apply to ANYTHING you sequence > with track 1, be it filter cutoff, pulse width, etc. At each of the > rests you program, whatever is being modulated by track 1 is going to > return to its base value. > > Make sense? Hope that helps. If it does, you can copy this message > to the SonicState thread in which you found the erroneous claim, and > maybe it will help someone else, too. > > On the other hand, if you REALLY are having the oscillators' pitch > shift down at the release of every key, and you're SURE you don't > have one of the envelopes controlling pitch, I think it's time to > email Dave Smith and tell him that you have a defective unit. I > really don't think that this will be the case, though. > > Best of luck! > > > Ski > www.ex5tech.com > EX5Tech Evolver forum: > http://www.ex5tech.com/ex5ubb_cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=forum&f=23 > > > --- In DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com, "linuxmanvan" <linuxmanvan@y...> > wrote: > > I recently saw this on a post, > > For some reason, the analog osc's go down to a lowest defined note, > > right after you release a key , > > This is what is causing my pain if it is true. Is there a way to get > > rid of this action?
Message
Re: SonicState post / alleged Evolver problem
2003-04-29 by linuxmanvan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.