thanks joe, but I didn't mean that I mean that there are controls for BPM and clock divide on the "Main" knobs and then they are replicated on row 2 of the matrix - these appear to do the same thing. If they do that seems an exception in an almost perfect piece of design! Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe" <jmelnyk@...> To: <DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 7:07 PM Subject: Re: [Evolver] why are there two controls for clock divide and BPM? > On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 06:11:58PM +0100, Richard wrote: > > I mean don't they do the same thing? > > no, they don't. one controls the tempo, the other controls when to > step within that tempo. it should be obvious that there's a difference > between 8H, 8S and 8t, for example; and you can't (effectively) do the > latter two with just a tempo control. > > a good question is probably: "but don't the 2, 4, 8 and 16 clock > divides just speed up the tempo?" they don't; they up the subdivision of > the tempo; there's a difference. this difference is most important when > the Evolver is slaved to external MIDI clock. if the clock is coming in > at 120BPM, the only way to change how to step within that tempo is with > the clock-divide control (since the BPM control will do nothing). > > BTW, I think I've butchered the terminology here; but I hope you get the > idea anyway :-) > > Joe > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > DSI_Evolver-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >
Message
Re: [Evolver] why are there two controls for clock divide and BPM?
2003-09-20 by Richard
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.