Dave Smith Instruments SYNTHESIZERS group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Dave Smith Instruments SYNTHESIZERS

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:43 UTC

Message

Re: [Evolver] The New DSI Polyphonic Synth

2003-09-28 by Richard

okay so its strictly an expander/module thingy, that would suit me fine as
it will make it is cheap as possible!! - I'm not joking, its an important
issue. I guess some pc/ mac programmer will be necessary too though I would
never use it myself: I think a 16 knob/16 led evolver2 would ultimately be a
MUCH better proposition and I'd happily pay the extra $100 or whatever for
the extra knobs... dunno about the rest of the world.

to be honest I'm so impressed with the evolver I'd probably buy a multi
version whatever it was, as long as I can carry it to a gig with my bad
back!

I wonder if a DSI digi/analogue drum machine has been
considered??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????? machinedrum is just too expensive for us
mere humans -  reckon DS could do a good job
Richard



----- Original Message -----
From: "ski_ex5tech" <ex5tech@...>
To: <DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 3:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Evolver] The New DSI Polyphonic Synth


> blip/bleep - Regarding a rack's lack of controls... maybe you missed
> the fact that you can use the tabletop Evo as a "programmer".
> Personally, I couldn't see owning the rack without the current
> tabletop.
>
>
> Ski
> www.ex5tech.com
> EX5Tech Evolver forum:
> http://www.ex5tech.com/ex5ubb_cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=forum&f=23
>
>
> --- In DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com, blip <bleep@w...> wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Richard wrote:
> >
> > > 1U is great - a 4 part 16 oscillator 1U dirtbox! But I don't
> quite get it -
> > > is it essentially intended as an expander utilising the existing
> evolver
> > > hardware or other midi controller interface? That could be pretty
> cheap to
> > > produce eh?? Or is it seen more as a standalone synth?
> >
> > yeah, i don't get it either... it seems like the only reasonable
> way to
> > use a 1RU synth as complicated as four evolvers is to use a
> computer for
> > the interface... i was kinda hoping for a 777-style tabletop form
> factor.
> > dedicated sequencer controls (especially since there are now SIXTEEN
> > sequences!) and so forth. oh well. guess this will be good for the
> guys
> > with keyboard controllers and drehbanks. without this stuff, i
> don't think
> > this poly evolver will be very good for live performance, not
> > improvisational stuff anyway, which the regular evolver is great
> for... i
> > guess i'm kind of disappointed. but i'm sure others will be happy...
> >
> > bleep.
> > out.
> >
> > ---
> > http://leichenfeld.iuma.com
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> DSI_Evolver-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.