I personally just hate using generic controllers - its one reason I can't stand softsynths. I like the feel of individual synths and I like to get to know them and where the important bits are located as I would a lovers' body. If they are all controlled from the same nuetral surface its just shagging isn't it? wow... I suppose I'm saying my lovers need to have multiple knobs :) Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Riccardo Coen" <zinoff@...> To: <DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 12:38 AM Subject: [Evolver] Re: The New DSI Polyphonic Synth - programmer interface > --- In DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com, blip <bleep@w...> wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, ski_ex5tech wrote: > > > > > All valid points regarding the interface. Perhaps a separate > > > dedicated "programmer/controller" would be something Dave would > > > consider building in the future, if enough people were interested. > > > > I don't get the point of the thread, there are hundreds of generic > control surfaces out there.... what's the point of building a new one? > > I can control most, if not all the parameters of the evolver, from my > drehbank, and of most of my synths in the studio. I already have no > space left on my desktop (uWave XT, Pod, evolver, drum machine > drehbank) > > I say, let's have Dave focus on great synth engines. > > Cheers, > /R > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > DSI_Evolver-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
Re: [Evolver] Re: The New DSI Polyphonic Synth - programmer interface
2003-09-29 by Richard
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.