On 12/10/02 3:14 AM, "Paul Nagle" <paul@...> wrote: > My gut feeling is that is it the exponential decay shape, not the > attack time that is preventing those really zappy basses. I have got > very close to the sound I like (and could normally get easily) by > using envelope 3 in conjunction with the filter envelope to add an > extra "oomph" at the start of a filter blip. The two envelopes > together make a pretty punchy sound although, I admit, not "Pulse > Punchy".... ;-) > > Other things that seem to affect punchiness are the keyboard tracking > of the filter (set this quite low) and the relationship of decay time > and sustain level - normally my filter envelope would have a zero > sustain but this just kills the sound too much because of the decay > shape. Am I making sense? Anyway, the third envelope is the key to me > - with the Evolver there's a way of doing "everything" - you just have > to figure it out <g> > Not yet having one in hand it's hard to make a meaningful suggestion but... Did you try changing the envelope's decay shape by having it control its own envelope times? The old self-feedback trick to make an exponential decay more linear (or even convex) or vice-versa? It seems the mod matrix at least offers control of overall envelope rates so even though separate control over decay would be best maybe a bit of control feedback would help? <you already know this trick I am sure but others may not> drk www.delora.com/music www.mp3.com/zdrk drk.iuma.com
Message
Re: [Evolver] Tell me why i should get it...
2002-12-10 by drK
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.