> Yes, I though about the random LFO function when > thinking about your > question too. I don't think you would need a > boundary parameter > though, since you would just use lfo "amount" to > determin how far > the sweep would go around the center wave set in the > osc. Also the > directions would be set (in regard to lfos) but the > lfo shape sort > of. > good point on the boundary parameter being taken care of by LFO depth... I never thought it through that far... I suppose uni-directional travel could be taken care of by ramp-up and/or ramp-down saw waves in the LFO... what would by nice though would be a "uni-polar" setting for the LFO... and not just for this purpose, but for any kind of LFO purpose... hell, *every* synth should have the ability to go uni-polar on the LFO's :-) > Damned right aren't we horrible wishlist people!!! > :) oh well. we're the ones who end up using the machines, aren't we? ;) > Next we'll be wanting keys and extra knobs added on! no, I like the compact nature of the Evolver myself. > FINALLY a keyboard rig that > makes sense in > NYC taxicabs!! hell I could even take the subway! see above :) ===== http://www.mp3.com/Spectralab alternate e-mail: spectralab@... __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [Evolver] Re: New sounds online
2002-09-18 by kevin paisley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.