On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 19:44:03 +0900, "Miles Bader" <miles@...> said: > Given a simplistic model of what filters and mixers do, it would seem > that the results would be identical; in real life, of course there are > issues like saturating the mixer, etc., that might make a difference. > yep. all the difference happens in the nonlinear area of the circuit's performance. Saturation of the filter produces sum and difference frequencies for the oscillator waveforms going into it. So having 4 signals going into 1 nonlinear system is different to having 2 pairs of 2 signals going into separate nonlinear systems. having the evolver as it is makes for some very good things, like stereo filtering effects, especially for external processing, but I can't help but wonder what it'd be like to be able to stack all four oscs just into one filter channel. My dream evolver would allow serial and parallel analogue filter arrangements (and the choice of HP, LP, BP, BR filter types for each filter) but I guess it'd be quite a pain for DS to make happen. It certianly wouldn't be just a firmware upgrade! :-) -- http://bleepin.com -- http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail...
Message
Re: [Evolver] Re: Quick, stupid question--
2006-01-25 by Julian
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.