Dave Smith Instruments SYNTHESIZERS group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Dave Smith Instruments SYNTHESIZERS

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:43 UTC

Message

Re: [Evolver] Digest Number 946

2006-03-09 by all@istar.ca

Many thanks Jon for your helpful response. Do you mind me asking just 
what keyboard you are using with the Evolver?

Thanks again -

Christopher



Message: 3
    Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 12:46:48 +0200
    From: jontu <pakana@...>
Subject: Re: Mono/MEK?

Hi,

(and sorry for not being Simon :-) )

If you already have controller keyboard, the use of MIDI CC's pretty
much overcomes any (minor, the layout is _very_ well though and gets
comfortable to use in no time, in my opinion) shortcomings of the
programming matrix on the desktop Evolver.  I have my keyboard's
faders and knobs routed to stuff like envelopes, cutoffs and
oscillator levels, turning the litte blue box into a very playable
instrument with a configurable interface.

As what comes to the sequencer, the Evolvers have four 16-step
sequencers. The desktop model matrix is 8 x 8, meaning that every
sequence is divided on two rows, and the single row of 8
column-indicator LEDs make two runs per sequence. The MEK seems to
have two rows of 8 knobs and LEDs above both them. This does probably
make it easier to follow a sequence, especially when examing a patch
someone else made.

But in practice, when working with your own sequences it is very
difficult to get "row-confused", as you always hear what you are
doing. And many use the Soundtower editor, which (supposedly, I prefer
working the real thing :-) ) has nice graphical representations of the
sequences and whatnots.

That said, the MEK surely is a great looking synth that surely has
more hands-on control than the desktop model by itself.

sunny days,

.jon

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.