I had a MicroQ.� I sold it because it sounded waaaaaay to Trancey (actually I traded it to someone for another xbase 09 haha!..� funny thing about that was the serial number on it was next one after mine, brothers from the lab!).� I would agree with the person who said "Soft, Smooth, Thick, etc...� thats what the MicroQ (and Trance)�sounds like.� Very glassy and produced.� If thats what yr looking for, go for that.� The two things I liked about that synth were big stacked (as in unison) bass, very wide�and you could get some really weird and spacey sounds by spending a bit of time routing the LFO's all over the place...� Also it's polyphonic and its 16 voice...� Evolver and MicroQ, two TOTALLY different synths...� I'm very glad to be rid of the MicroQ�and I LOVE my Evolver...� saving for a PEK...� cant f'ing wait!
�
David....
�
�
-----Original Message-----
From: punkdISCO
Sent: Mar 28, 2006 11:12 AM
To: DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Evolver] Re: comment Re: Evolver trance sounds?
> This must be the most intelligent/even-handed discussion of trance vs.
> electro vs. analog vs. digital vs. virus etc that I've ever seen on
> the net. Usually such threads turn to sh*** within 2 or 3 posts.
Thats because there is almost no point in mentioning the fact that Trance
sucks anymore as it is now so widely accepted.� Indeed, if you look up
'sucks' in a dictionary it simply states: see 'Trance'..
Only joking of course..� As we all know, every genre has it's gems.� Sure,
slightly more illusive within Trance but the gems are there..
:-)
Paul
London
www.punkdisco.co.uk
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- �Visit your group "DSI_Evolver" on the web.
� - �To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
�DSI_Evolver-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
� - �Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.