MW XT: I loved the idea of it, and had one for a while, but I always found in the mix it din't really do it for me - for me I didn't find the overall sound was quite defined enough for me (or something, not edgy enough). I'd jump at an MW with the analogue filters, that would do it for me. Its funny that this should come up here as I found that the evolver is much closer to the sound I was after. I know that they aren't really comparable, but I was after something that had that digital element (a wider range of textures then tri, pulse n' saw), and was bit different, and for me the evolver fills that gap. But then I don't sweat the polyphony ;) Paul Nagle wrote: > On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 02:25:03 +0100, c00kie <cookie@...> > wrote: > > >>Since the XT has audio inputs, are these mono or stereo ? > > > It is a stereo socket, labelled stereo but actually is summed > internally to mono. This has been a marketing con by Waldorf for years > but I really hope they intend to fix it in the next OS release. > > I sold my XT and kept my Virus. I may get another one day but I > haven't honestly missed it that much. I found that, whilst I > programmed it extensively, I almost always replaced it with some other > synth in my final mixes. > > Paul > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > DSI_Evolver-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > >
Message
Re: [Evolver] Re: Evolver as an FX Processor // MWXT
2003-02-21 by Alex
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.