On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 19:47:52 +0100, c00kie <cookie@...> wrote: >Depends... of course this detail should be mentioned, but I can think why >they did so. AFAIK, the XT has no true stereo engine like the evolver, but >the engine is mono and stereo is produced at the amp stage of the signal. >Therefore, it is only possible to work with mono input. A mono jack would >be enough, but by the way they did it, you can simply connect any stereo >source without having to worry about signal levels when panning occurs in >the source. I think they intended to allow individual input processing using the multitimbral mode. Maybe they still will. There are cool things still coming for the Microwave series I think/hope. >If they advertised stereo input, they may have hired someone from the >marketing division of the sirius cybernetic corporation :-) It was advertised that way in the UK at least - and you can't blame the distributors. Waldorf labelled the input "stereo". >Anyway, mono is not as great but still godd enough... Not for me. I may get another one day though because it was *fun* to program... and nothing does those "Forbidden Planet" noises quite like a Microwave <g>. Well, actually the Evolver has an amazing range of weirdy sounds too! Simon wrote: >You've sure come a long way from your review of the XT >in SOS ;) Hehe, well I *did* buy one. And then I waited a few years for some fixes, the synth to be "finished off". When I got fed up waiting, I sold it. Maybe after Frankfurt I'll be encouraged to get another. I only keep instruments that excite me, that work for me in mixes, that do a valuable job of their own. I'm not a collector... Paul
Message
Re: [Evolver] Re: Evolver as an FX Processor // MWXT
2003-02-22 by Paul Nagle
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.