Dave Smith Instruments SYNTHESIZERS group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Dave Smith Instruments SYNTHESIZERS

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:43 UTC

Thread

SoundTower plans for MIDI/VST software

SoundTower plans for MIDI/VST software

2006-11-26 by soundtower_helpdesk

Hi all,

The team at SoundTower has spent the balance of this year on 
redevelopment plans that have involved looking at all of our 
existing programs with an eye for optimization, enhancement and 
cross-platform compatibility. Part of the process has been tested 
successfully in rebuilding our editor for Waldorf's Q, Roger Linn's 
Adren II and a new editor for M-Audio's BLACKBOX for Mac and PC 
platforms.

We are now reorganizing our resources to make the best use of our 
programmer's time over the next year. We plan on looking at each of 
our programs for conversion but we are only going to do this after 
getting as much input from users of our current programs.

In light of these developments we are putting out a call for input. 
We are hoping for more that just polite comment but concrete 
suggestions that we might be able to implement in our new structure.

Some of the small things we have started, and will continue to do, 
is re-packaging our existing programs in an installer which includes 
our licensing agreement and User Guide in PDF that will be installed 
on your OS for easier reference.

We have in development an help page that will have all of our FAQ's 
and User Guides linked, as well as websites for patches, organized 
for one stop resource if it has to deal with our programs.

This is part of our ongoing concern for our customers well being. I 
am fervent in my desire that move forward only with your imput.

The two main areas of endeavour that has consummed our time of late 
has been the rebuilding of our programs for use on both MAC and PC 
platforms and developing the ground work for VST plugin capability 
for our future editors.

So please send me any of your comments for improvement and wishes 
for software. I cannot promise the implementation of all of your 
ideas but I promise a considered review of anything you send to us. 
Much of our improvements over the years have been inspired by, if 
not outright suggested by, you.

Thanks for your time
Derek
soudntower_helpdesk@...
www.soundtower.com/

Re: SoundTower plans for MIDI/VST software

2006-11-28 by barzindaragahi

My two cents. 

I also own a Access Virus TI.  It took them for ever to get the the VST 
to work correctly.  It's no small undertaking and the pay-off may not 
be that great since you already have great software and a customer base 
that is happy with it.  I appreciate your vision in taking the company 
in a whole new direction.  But I would start with a NEW Synth 
altogether.  That way you can put a new product to market for an 
entirely different synth.  The Stand-Alone software you have is very 
good.  VST might be over-kill right now.  Plus, isn't another company 
(vyzor) building one?  Two VST interfaces for my PEK?  Hmmmm.  My other 
gear is very jealous.  I say go with another Synth for your first VST.  

Another synth will kill three birds with one stone, 1) develop MIDI to 
VST technology, 2) test the concept on a group of users who have 
nothing and would most likely eat it up with no expectations (i.e. 
Evolver users would want the same stability as your stand alone), 3) 
use the same proven methods to port your existing stand-alones in 2008. 

How many people are Analogue knob junkies like me vs. VST users that 
own a type of Evolver?  I vote, build a interface similar to what you 
have for the Alesis Andromeda A6, Jomox Synths, Studio Electronics, 
Akai MPC line, and half dozen other beat boxes, etc. etc. So much gear 
that needs it right now.  People would gobble it up.  You can sell 
those for $200 a pop and people would bite.  I would.  

I probably wouldn't understand the PEK they way I do without your 
software. Always good to create patches and multies. It's helped me 
learn the Synth.  


Like I said, it's just my 2 cents, probably 100 ways you can dismiss my 
aurgument, but I just thought I'd throw it out there.

Re: [Evolver] Re: SoundTower plans for MIDI/VST software

2006-11-28 by SoundTower_Help Desk

Hi barzindaragahi,
I wouldn't try to marshal 1 arguement against what you wrote, let alone 100. For one, I'm not that bright and, for another, you are not wrong in my estimation.
I may have inadvertantly mislead you. Your point that another synth would be better to try on first is well taken. We are actually working on another synth. I am not at liberty to disclose which one.
Our 2c. We believe you are absolutely right. The VST instuments concept is a valuable tool but isn't the be-all or end-all of the industry. This is a step in addition to other new sequencer software concepts in MIDI/Audio technology. If we do not participate in a strategic entry into this area we may find we lose out on the next. What we are doing is developing intermediate solutions, not rebulding old apps from scratch. Perhaps this is wrong headed but in our analysis this makes the most long term sense. We have not plans, ever, of becoming a soft synth company.

Here, you might find this an interesting read: http://www.bigbluelounge.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=45249
(SoundTower has not expressed opinion as to the validity or truth of this above post: I offer it only as information regarding the direction that VST seems to be moving.)
Thanks again for the comments and the kind words regarding out stand alone editors. We are both proud of them and humbled that musicians consider them of use.
cheers
Derek

barzindaragahi wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
My two cents.

I also own a Access Virus TI. It took them for ever to get the the VST
to work correctly. It's no small undertaking and the pay-off may not
be that great since you already have great software and a customer base
that is happy with it. I appreciate your vision in taking the company
in a whole new direction. But I would start with a NEW Synth
altogether. That way you can put a new product to market for an
entirely different synth. The Stand-Alone software you have is very
good. VST might be over-kill right now. Plus, isn't another company
(vyzor) building one? Two VST interfaces for my PEK? Hmmmm. My other
gear is very jealous. I say go with another Synth for your first VST.

Another synth will kill three birds with one stone, 1) develop MIDI to
VST technology, 2) test the concept on a group of users who have
nothing and would most likely eat it up with no expectations (i.e.
Evolver users would want the same stability as your stand alone), 3)
use the same proven methods to port your existing stand-alones in 2008.

How many people are Analogue knob junkies like me vs. VST users that
own a type of Evolver? I vote, build a interface similar to what you
have for the Alesis Andromeda A6, Jomox Synths, Studio Electronics,
Akai MPC line, and half dozen other beat boxes, etc. etc. So much gear
that needs it right now. People would gobble it up. You can sell
those for $200 a pop and people would bite. I would.

I probably wouldn't understand the PEK they way I do without your
software. Always good to create patches and multies. It's helped me
learn the Synth.

Like I said, it's just my 2 cents, probably 100 ways you can dismiss my
aurgument, but I just thought I'd throw it out there.


Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.