Fantastic response. You've given me a few more things to consider. Thanks again. --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "emf" <liberatusvirus@y...> wrote: > > --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "Thomas" <kveldalf@h...> wrote: > > > RE: DTXpress III Special > > > > I have recently rekindled an old flame with drumming, and due to > noise levels must > > consider electronic drums instead of acoustic. After watching demo > videos of Roland V12 > > and the DTXpress III Special, there's strong reason why I am > considering Roland instead of > > Yamaha. > > Questions: > > Can you add snare buzz to the toms? > > I've listened to the member samples, and unfortunately cannot say > this helps clarify the > > concerns I have. The voices seem to be "cut short" that is, for > example, the wash/ring of > > the cymbal crashes don't sound quite right--same with the snare > sounds. Are there any > > jazz drummers who can post and example of this kit? > > Thomas, > > You sound like a man who's made up his mind, and I'd be very > surprised if anyone on this board felt obligated to change it. > There's absolutely no reason why you shouldn't buy a Roland kit. In > fact, your reasons for being so inclined are the usual ones: Roland > certainly scores high points on presentation. Yamaha e-drums don't > have the support of the company that you might imagine, though the > situation is apparently is about to get better. Roland's commerial > dominance obscures other worthy players in this litte game. The > reasons are complicated. > > I'm not quite sure which Roland kit you mean to reference, but > judging from your remark about snare buzz, I'd suspect that it's the > TD-20, which is really an unfair comparison with the much-less > expensive DTXpress Special, as good as it is. The DTXPSP should go > head to head with the Roland TD-6 kits and possibly TD-8s, and the > new DTXtemeIIS with the TD-8s, though many people (like me) also > regard it as a good, cost-effective alternative to the TD-20. > > Most of the differences kits at similar price points come down to > subjective impressions of sounds and feel. There are no slam dunks of > the kind that you mention, such as having to hit the Yamahas too hard > or the cymbals/snare not having enough sustain. It is incredibly > difficult to rely on computer samples to evaluate e-drums. It's hard > enough finding a kit at your local GC or drum shop to audition, let > alone one that hasn't been beaten into submission by the conquering > hordes. It's regrettable, but unavoidable at this point, that unless > you have the wherewithal to check out e-drums firsthand, somewhere > along the line you're going to have to trust the information on > websites, stores, magazines, etc. The fact that Roland owns the > market is no indication of what a Yamaha product, or any other, can > do, but you'll have to solve that problem to your own satisfaction. > To my mind, snare buzzes are a nice gimmick but not much to hang your > hat on in the long view. Price, feature sets, playability, sounds, > versatility, et al. are the variables that will matter most. > Personally, I'm a big fan of Yamaha as an e-drum company, but I am > also a Clavia ddrum owner. Researching ddrum is much harder than > researching Yamaha. > > > Here's a web address where you can find a sound video of the DTXpress > SP: http://namm.harmony-central.com/WNAMM04/Index/. Go down the page > until you hit Yamaha's videos from Winter NAMM. It's probably better > than the one you saw from Yamaha Europe, though it still doesn't > measure up to Roland's. We've been expecting a high-quality DTXtreme > IIS video by Tony Verderosa for some time. We'll see. Anyway, I hope > that you view my post as an invitation to ask whatever questions you > might have. > > Ed
Message
Re: Considering purchase; seeking feedback to concerns/questions
2005-03-06 by Thomas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.