--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "bongokonzelmann" <carsten@h...> wrote: > The final result was that I had to say that the Ddum 4 SE kit > impressed me by far the most. Great feel (rebound, sensitivity/dynamic > repsonse, pad size, look), great sounds (natural, sensitive to how > hard you hit), possibility to download further sounds from the > extensive Clavia library, robust and durable pads and rack - last not > least the price as it is now offered at 2,699 Euros, roughly 1,000 > lower than the street price over the last years. > > However there are some downsides I would like to hear your views on: > - the rack seemed to stiff to me. Lots off cross talking. Can that be > sorted by parameter settings? > - The cymbal pads appear too be too hard, too small, don“t swing - can > it be combined with cymbals from other manufacturers? > - The sales guy told me that the substantial rebate they grant is due > to the fact that it will be discontinued and they actually had bought > all of the remaining stock. He said that Clavia sold its drums > division to some US company currently working in the acoustic drums > sector. This seems to get announced at the summer NAMM. - Has anybody > heard something about it and would you probably recommend not to buy > as support would be ending soon? > > Long story. I am at a loss here and would kindly ask for your support > again that was so valuable over the last two years. Thanks in advance. Bongo, As a ddrum owner, I agree with all of the good things said about it and all of the bad things. I use only the ddrum module, preferring my own Pearl rack, mesh head pads, and Visulite cymbals to the standard-- issue ddrum components, even though response can be slightly anomalous in some cases (I will go into this point in more detail if anyone is interested). I do use the ddrum hi hat because it is really the only one immediately compatible with the module. Crosstalk can be eliminated with a setting on the module called threshold for each pad; unlike rejection on the Yamaha modules, it works regardless of whether the offending vibration originates on the rack or elsewhere. People have worried that threshold would cut down on the sensitivity of ddrum's analog triggering, but most users have no complaints. The module is remarkable for its sounds, and its available library. The drawbacks are the kit size, which cannot be expanded via MIDI, only by adding another module (which I do) and the painful constriction of memory, which severely impacts the amount of data the the module will hold at one time. MIDI functionality is limited to 10 voices--that is, the module's capacity as shipped. Plus, triggering over MIDI is not as good as triggering through the module, since the analog section is far superior to any digital facsimile. Clavia sold ddrum to Dean, their US distributor, lock, stock, and barrel, not long ago. Dean maintains that it will keep the line up and running as well as ever, even promising to deliver a much-needed ddrum5 in the not too distant future--something that Clavia had no intention of doing. We in the ddrum community have been in touch with Dean representatives about these matters, and we are optimistic. But it remains to be seen what actually happens. I would buy a ddrum module, even if the company had folded completely. I like it that much, but I would also expect to use it in conjunction with another module, preferably one that was more MIDI- capable, to give it more size and versatility. Any of the Yamaha modules might fit the bill. The ddrum pads themselves are fine, though the originals and the later mesh ones don't necessarily share the same characteristics from the module (again, more later if needed). I prefer a larger snare, 13 or 14 inches instead of 10. I use a Pintech AX14S; other people use Hart pads. Cymbals are more complicated, but as a rule, single-zone cymbals from other companies are better with ddrum than stereo or dual-zones, both of which are useless. But the position of the piezo will determine whether the cymbal behaves in the expected manner. I hope this helps. I'm doing this quickly because I have to leave. Ed
Message
Re: Ddrum versus DTXPress
2005-03-12 by emf
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.