--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "deanerdrummer" <deanscott@a...> wrote: > > Ed: > > Thanks. Your input is very helpful. Thanks for the tip on the Rolls mixer. Do > you have any opinion on the Behringer Euroracks? Some of those are under > $100. Wondering how they compare to the MX28. Dean, FX's tip immediately before this post is probably a good one, although I'm not sure that you need to spend an inordinate amount of time getting confused and anxious about what relatively inexpensive mixer to buy. I'll come clean. Even though many members of this group happily use Behringer electronics--including my highly respected partner in crime OGD, who has a Behringer amp or two--I'm not a big fan of the company. I didn't like what I'd heard about its business practices, and I have this nagging feeling that ultimately its prices confirm that you get what you pay for (for a long time, if not now, its reliability left much to be desired). I'm willing to stand corrected, and have, by testimony to the contrary here and elsewhere. Behringer just isn't where I tend to go. That said, the Rolls is a small, stripped-down unit that doesn't offer any frills (no eq., send/return, etc.), only volume and pan for each stereo input, a master level control, and a headphone output that can be split; the money has gone into the admittedly small number of parts. It sounds good, and it takes up almost no room at all. I'm a believer that tone controls and the like are best left alone, except under unusual circumstances. Yamaha has a solid mixer, much more elaborate, with everything an e-drummer could possibly need and more (at least as much as any Behringer at the price), that is also a bargain at just about $100. I forget the model number, even though I have one, as well as a Rolls and others. If you'd like the model number, let me know. You should be able to get it online at Musicians Friend or the like. Ed
Message
Re: best way to expand?
2005-03-15 by emf
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.