Hey Walt - Thanks for all of the SUPER info. I appreciate it! Not having ever owned or played an electronic kit - advice from others is all I have to go on. Sounds like the DTXpressII may be the one for me. Question #1 - Re: the (2) extra mono inputs - could I use one input for a cymbal bell on top of the ride and could I use the other input for an extra crash? Or am I incorrect in thinking I can do that? Question #2 - Is the response and feel of the cymbal pads the same as the drum pads on the DTXpressII? If so, could you use a 3 zone drum pad connected to the ride input and use it as a ride to trigger 3 seperate sounds (bell, ride, crash)???? (that may be a crazy question but is something I've thought about). Question #3 - Walt, could you explain to me a little further what you mean by your following statement in quotations - "When I ran out of inputs on a module, I could always add more". Do you mean you'd do this by buying another module? Thanks again very much to Walt and everyone in this group, and as soon as I get my new kit (probably the DTXpressII), I will definately share my thoughts on it with you. Thanks! - Mike --- Walt <wgardus@...> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > No apologies required for the enthusiasm - we all > get > it when we talk about buying new gear (as Walt wipes > the drool from his keyboard). > > Anyway, lets break this into a few areas. First, > the > pads. The xpress II has the newest technology in > this > area. I haven't tried them myself, but many of the > recent posts on them have been positive, especially > on > the bass tower having a larger pad area. The KP60 > and > KP80 towers have had some negative comments made > about > their reliability and performance, only time will > tell > if similar comments are made about the new tower. > Moving to the snare/tom pads, the TP80S dual zone > pads > tend to have less than perfect response on the rim > triggers - the main part of the pads is solid > though. > The xpress II has the newer 3 zone pads, and the > pads > have a different texture than the originals ones > did. > On the topic of cymbal pads, many of us have cracked > the underlying plastic base on original line. The > PCY80S also likes to collect dust causing problems. > We'll have to see how the new cymbal pads work out. > > So if the most advanced technology is what you want, > the xpress II would seem to be the winner for the > pads. > > Next the modules. We have 3 listed, the DTX and the > DTXpress I and II. From a number of inputs view, I > believe the DTX wins with 8 dual zone inputs and 4 > mono inputs. Both of the xpress versions only have > 2 > mono inputs, plus the xpress II has 8 - 3 zone > inputs > while the xpress I has 8 dual inputs. I would need > to > look at the specs to be sure, but I believe the DTX > has the strongest processor and number of > simultaneous > voices. From a perspective of which has the newest > technology, the DTX is the oldest, followed by the > xpress I, then the xpress II. So, if the latest > technology is more important than everything else, > the > xpress II would be the one. If having the most > inputs > is more important, the DTX has the most. > > So, what would Walt buy, given the three choices? A > glass of whiskey first, then I think I would go with > the xpress II. The 2 extra mono inputs on the DTX > would not be more important to me than the newer > triggering technology would be. As I have expanded > my > kit, triggering problems have been the most > troublesome. When I ran out of inputs on a module, > I > could always add more, but if I couldn't get a > trigger > to work right, I was SOL. Some people may wonder > where the additional features and power of the DTX > (5 > layers, chaining, etc) fits into my thinking - I > think > the average drummer can certainly find uses for > them, > but unless you're going to really explore them, they > are (more than likely) not going to add much extra > value to you. > > Now, to the rest of you viewing this topic - fire > away! > > The opinions expressed in this post are not > influenced > by Jack Daniels (hic), well, not much anyway! > --- Mike Warren Autographs > <mikewarrenautographs@...> wrote: > > Hi. New to the group - this is my 2nd post and I > > really enjoy the group and all of the great info! > As > > mentioned in previous post, I am (was) planning to > > get > > new DTXpressII but have been looking now at the > > DTXpress LE and the DS10XP LE at the Musician's > > Friend > > web site (see below link): > > > http://www.musiciansfriend.com/srs7/sid=020916200457172142163159419231/search/g=perc?q=dtxpress > > > > Question: (maybe Walt will have a little advice > > here) > > - of the (3) kits listed below: > > DTXpressII - $999 > > DTXpress LE - $799 > > DS10XP LE - $999 > > > > which kit would you go with and why? They are all > > very > > close to the same price so saving a little money > > here > > or there is not a big deal for me, but out of the > > (3), > > I am wanting the most advanced of the (3) sets and > > would like the option of expanding and adding more > > pads in the future (I also play double bass). So > > considering my needs, which set??? And how much > more > > expadable is the DS10XP LE over the DTXpress? It > > probably will boil down to a decision between the > > DTXpressII and the DS10XP LE - is the DS10XP brain > > and > > pads superior to that of the DTXpressII? ANY and > ALL > > info greatly appreciated. Thanks everybody!!! I > hope > > I > > have not been TOO long winded here - just anxious > > and > > excited about getting my first electronic kit!!! : > ) > > - Mike > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! News - Today's headlines > > http://news.yahoo.com > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! News - Today's headlines > http://news.yahoo.com > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [DTXpress] DS10XP Limited Edition (HELP)
2002-09-18 by Mike Warren Autographs
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.