Thanks for the input Walt. I think, for my needs, that a single pad would work best.Whether it is stereo or dual only matters because I have already used all the inputs. I would have to give up my extra crash or my accessory pad. I could actually do without the crash more that the accessory(woodblock, cowbell, sidestick, handclap, tambourine, tympani, etc.) The rim switch on the pcy80s actually works pretty well. If I could keep it more rigid, it might work. I have the little goodies that keep them from turning(a big problem), and I use oversized washers to help control the swing, but they still move too much for my liking for HH and Ride use. I'm thinking possibly a bar-type pad, mounted at the front and just slightly below where I would normally hit the pad, I may be able to get it. I'll keep working on it. Thanks again... Scott --- In DTXpress@y..., Walt <wgardus@y...> wrote: > Hi Scott, > > I did have a kit defined with the edge of a TP80S pad > having a partially open HH sound, while on the main > pad I had more of a HH bow (and stronger attack HH > sound) and it worked fairly well. I have noticed that > some TP80Ss have better rim trigger response than > others, but where stereo pads are concerned, my > experience is that many (if not all of them) seem to > suffer this inconsistency. They all seem to work best > near the trigger itself (which typically is right near > the mount point), so sometimes you can jockey the > mounting so you're striking the pad on the rim > trigger. You could try a dual trigger pad too - > giving you more control over the interactions, or > prevention of them by using two inputs. > > I think if you want to do this reliably, you may want > to use two HHs. I had also run two pads and two > pedals, with the edge HH on the right side of the kit, > near the ride, and the bow one on my left - both > pedals were side by side. Now, running two HHs is a > bit of a pain in itself, but if reliability is what > you want, running two HHs, one set for edge sounds and > one set for bow sounds will get you that. Of course, > this also requires two modules, and of course two > modules means more potential for those unused inputs > to leak, requiring the immediate insertion of new > (more) triggers to stem the flow, but let's not go > there... > > Walt > > > Does anyone use a stereo pad on HiHat? I'm > > interested in getting the > > 'edge' sound that I miss with the pad. On real > > HiHats, the edge played > > with the shoulder of the stick a more mushy, harsh > > sound than the tip > > of the stick on the bow. Can you get that > > difference ? What type pad. > > I think everyone agrees that the tp80S sucks. And > > the PCY80S moves too > > much. I use a tom pad for ride cymbal too because > > the cymbal pads move > > too much! > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! > http://sbc.yahoo.com
Message
Re: HH pad options
2002-09-28 by hairytrigger
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.