Steve, I'm on the road, but I wanted to make one thing clear. Rejection proper is also a local phenomenon on the dtx. In principle, it, like specific rejection, won't work on crosstalk emanating from pads connected to another interface either. But the longshot is that when you hit the tom on the PM-16, you may also be hitting something on the dtx, like the kick--at least some of the time--that will activate rejection and protect the cymbal. Like I said, it's a longshot. In general, the PM-16 and the dtx have to take care of their own. Ed --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "liberatusvirus <liberatusvirus@y...>" <liberatusvirus@y...> wrote: > Steve, > > That can be trouble. When trying to keep crosstalk down in a case > like that, it's best to have triggers that are susceptible to each > other connected to the same interface whenever possible, just so > that you can target them specifically if the interface lets you. I > don't recall what provisions the PM-16 makes for isolating > particular triggers from each other, but UNH or Walt should be able > to tell you. Until they show up, if the cymbal on the dtx is > reacting to the toms on the PM-16, you might be able to find a > general rejection setting for the cymbal on the dtx that eliminates > the crosstalk from vibration (remember to keep the value as low as > you can; rejection essentially mutes the protected pad for a brief > interval when other triggers are hit at a force within the range of > the rejection setting; you can see how that might create other > difficulties). Unfortunately, because the dtx's specific rejection > works only on local pads, it is irrelevant in this case. But you can > also try reducing the cymbal's gain and raising its min. vel. a > touch, if you can afford it. > > Ed > --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Parker" <stepar@a...> wrote: > > Ed, > > Thanks for the education. One thing I forgot to mention was that > the crosstalk is coming from pads plugged into my PM-16, where the > cymbols are plugged into the DTX. Does that change anything? > > > > Steve > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: liberatusvirus <liberatusvirus@y...> > > To: DTXpress@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 10:50 AM > > Subject: [DTXpress] Re: reducing vibration > > > > > > Hi Steve, > > > > The official term for that kind of vibration interference is > > crosstalk, and the module's cure for it comes under various > forms of > > rejection in the trigger menu. If a particular cymbal is > reacting to > > a particular tom when struck, go into the trigger menu for that > > cymbal and toggle pages until you get to the specific rejection > > page. Set that particular cymbal/input--which I assume is on > either > > input 6 or input 7--to specifically reject that tom, but only as > > high a value as necessary to do the trick. Rejection reduces the > > responsiveness of the pad that's protected. If you're having > more > > general trouble protecting that cymbal from crosstalk, then > access > > the rejection page--rather than, or in addition to, specific > > rejection--to set a number just high enough to stop the > crosstalk. > > > > As if that weren't enough, sometimes gain and/or min.velocity > > settings can affect crosstalk as well. If your gain on that > cymbal > > is very high, it will be more susceptible to external > interference. > > Likewise, if its min.vel. setting is very low, it may also > attract > > crosstalk more easily. The trick is find gain, min. velociy, > and > > rej. settings that will allow you to get the sensitivity that > you > > want without triggering the wrong pads in the process. > > > > Ed > > > > --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "pinachee <stepar@a...>" > > <stepar@a...> wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > I've been having a problem with hearing a cymbol sound when I > hit > > my > > > toms that are attached to the same piece of pipe and the > vibration > > > from hitting the tom is setting off the cymbol. Has anyone > done > > > anything to prevent this problem, like put tape on the pipe > under > > the > > > cymbol clamp. If I can't find a solution, I might have to > just > > attach > > > the cymbols to cymbol stands instead of directly on the bar. > Any > > > ideas or thoughts would be appreciated. At 46, I'm not quite > as > > old > > > as some of you old timers, but I'm no kid either....lol. OK, > I > > guess > > > we are all still kids. > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > > ADVERTISEMENT > > > > > > > > > > Community email addresses: > > Post message: DTXpress@onelist.com > > Subscribe: DTXpress-subscribe@onelist.com > > Unsubscribe: DTXpress-unsubscribe@onelist.com > > List owner: DTXpress-owner@onelist.com > > > > Shortcut URL to this page: > > http://www.onelist.com/community/DTXpress > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service.
Message
Re: reducing vibration
2003-03-01 by liberatusvirus <liberatusvirus@yahoo.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.