Really Inspector, do you seriously expect me to believe that on 5/9/03 12:20 pm, "moosetication" <moosetication@...> said: > --- Paul Bentley wrote: >> How important is polyphony with regard to a brain... > > Depends. If you were to layer every voice on every pad, you end up > using a lot of voices. For example, I have three stereo cymbals, so > each pad has two voices - six overall. But each of those voices has > two layers, so I'm actually using twelve "polyphony" voices on those > cymbals alone - and because of sustain, they could well be sounding > simultaneously. Now look at all the pads... three "triple zone", five > stereo, and two mono. That makes a grand total of 42 "polyphony" > voices. You'd have to move faster than me to get them all to sound > simultaneously, mind. > > You can hear the effect of this if you play along with any of the > built-in songs (sad, but I do from time to time), because they all > use voices too. When doing so, cymbal, crashes often choke early > because the brain has run out of voices. > > I can't imagine managing on 16... Ah......yes of course, thanks Stewart. Just like computers, more is better! (It was only when I was trying to compare brains that I noticed the flagship Roland TD-10 actually has fewer voices (56) than the lowly TD-6 (64)!)
Message
Re: [DTXpress] Re: Polyphony?
2003-09-05 by Paul Bentley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.