I've been wanting to install these trigger assemblies--jack, wired piezo(s), foam, and adhesive dots--in my snare and toms for a long time. I honestly wish that I had done it sooner. In my situation, they represent a significant upgrade from Pintech's earlier method of triggering mesh heads. My impressions are based on use exclusively with a ddrum4 module at this point. First of all, not everyone with Pintech toms and snares needs this upgrade. Mine date back, in at least one case, to 2001 and encompass both styles of 10" ConcertCasts--those with the metal grill across the bottom and those with the single bar. Any that feature the foam trapezoid with the piezo either embedded within it or lying beneath it directly on the rail qualify for the new version. What's different is mainly the replacement of the foam trapezoid with a specially fabricated foam cylinder or pillar. (After all, a piezo is a piezo is a piezo, and jacks, wires, and solder are, to a certain degree in this game, pretty unspectacular.) In the single-zone ConcertCast, the piezo should sit on the bottom plate with the pillar on top of it. Pintech supplies the necessary adhesives. The dual-zone adds a second piezo that fastens on the inside of the shell with adhesive as well as a metal fastener that folds over the shell's edge. As the head tightens, it tamps down on the pillar, thereby stabilizing it and ensuring good communication between the mesh and the piezo. If the heads aren't tight enough, the foam will create a little bump at the center of the playing surface. If they're too tight, the stress on the tension rods might be too great. Let moderation, as my father and Aristotle used to say, be your guide. I placed an inch-long strip of two-sided tape at the top of the pillar, just in case it had a mind to wander beneath the head. The AX14S presents a slightly different setting from the ConcertCasts. Inside the original snare were a few layers of foam resting on the bottom head, which served as a foundation for the foam trapezoid. The head piezo was stuck on the underside of a small metal plate between the trapezoid and the foundation. The two positive and negative wires from the jack went up through the foam base to the piezo. Replacing the trapezoid with the new pillar allows a little flexibility about how exactly to situate the piezo--for instance, above or below the metal plate that holds the pillar. I chose "below." Cutting to the chase, the difference, pure and simple, is better coverage across the head. As for the hot spot issue, it would be hard to argue that it is totally absent, given the center position of the piezo/column, but with a ddrum module, which depends on such center placement for some of its effects, it simply isn't an issue. I'd like to try these triggers with a Yamaha module, too. I can't tell from the ddrum's reaction whether they would have any affect on the dynamic range of Pintech pads with the DTXPU and other Yamaha modules. The other benefit of the new triggers is improved definition of individual strokes. I didn't notice the extent to which my original triggers (on the ConcertCasts, not the AX14S) did not always differentiate fully between closely spaced hits, like flams, until I installed the new ones. There's no doubt that my drums play better. I'd be interested in what other members who've been able to compare both old and new triggers through various modules have to say. Ed
Message
First Take on "New" Pintech Triggers for ConcertCasts and AX14S
2004-02-16 by emf
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.