Yamaha DTXpress/DTXplorer/DTXtreme group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Yamaha DTXpress/DTXplorer/DTXtreme

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:44 UTC

Thread

RE: Spam:Re: Spam:[DTXpress] DTXpress III hihat upgrade Q.

RE: Spam:Re: Spam:[DTXpress] DTXpress III hihat upgrade Q.

2006-06-06 by Damon, Rob

I used the PCY65S for the hihat pad for nearly two years without any
problems. Most of the PCY10's I had are gone. I still have two that I
continue to use as small splash cymbals.

 

________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: DTXpress@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DTXpress@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of geerayman
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 4:16 PM
To: DTXpress@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Spam:Re: Spam:[DTXpress] DTXpress III hihat upgrade Q.

 

I remember reading one of your posts about your hihat setup. Based 
on your replies to my other post and this one, I'm now thinking that 
the PCY65S might be the way to go for the hihat rather than a Roland 
CY-5. Is the edge durable enough to withstand lots of shoulder-of-
the-stick hits?

Also, I started looking for a PCY-10 to eventually add to the 
ride "cymbal", but came up with nil. Do you still have one you'd be 
willing for part with for a fair price?

Thanks!

Lito

--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com <mailto:DTXpress%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"Damon, Rob" <rdamon@...> wrote:
>
> You could use the RHH130 (comes with the Special) on a remote cable
> hihat. 
> 
> 
> 
> Before I upgraded to the Dtxtreme IIS, I used a PCY65S pad on a 
cymbal
> arm instead of the TP65 pad for my hihat. There was more give to 
it. At
> the time I had two Dtxpress modules and put a PCY10 bell pad on 
top of
> the PCY65S pad and through a little cable splitting/combining made 
a
> true three zone hihat pad (bell/pad/edge) that was controlled by a
> single HH65 pedal. I described this in detail here in the group, 
but it
> goes back several years. 
> 
> 
> 
> OGD
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: DTXpress@yahoogroups.com <mailto:DTXpress%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:DTXpress@yahoogroups.com <mailto:DTXpress%40yahoogroups.com> ]
On
> Behalf Of geerayman
> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 12:45 PM
> To: DTXpress@yahoogroups.com <mailto:DTXpress%40yahoogroups.com> 
> Subject: Spam:[DTXpress] DTXpress III hihat upgrade Q.
> 
> 
> 
> Okay, don't have my DTXpress III yet, but I'm thinking about 
upgrades 
> already. I like the rack-mounted hihat pad that comes on the 
Roland 
> kits, but I've heard that people have had limited success getting 
them 
> to function with the DTXIII module. Are there any alternative 
hihat 
> pads that I can mount on the rack like the stock one, preferably 
with 
> edge triggers? I'd consider the 3-zone TP-65S, but I'm concerned 
> about the rim wear, plus, it doesn't look like a hihat pad. Even 
> though the hihat/stand that comes with the III SP probably would 
be 
> ideal, I don't want to use a separate hihat stand.
> 
> __
> 
> 
> 
__________________________________________________________
_
> The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information 
intended
> only for use to the individual or entity to which it is addressed. 
If
> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, 
distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in 
reliance upon, this information is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please contact the sender and 
delete the material from your computer.
> 
__________________________________________________________
_
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security 
System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
<http://www.messagelabs.com/email>  
> 
__________________________________________________________
_
>

 
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended
only for use to the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Spam:Re: Spam:[DTXpress] DTXpress III hihat upgrade Q.

2006-06-06 by geerayman

Thanks for the info!  Oh, and I just figured out who "OGD" is -- it 
took me a while...  ;-)

Lito

--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "Damon, Rob" <rdamon@...> wrote:
>
> I used the PCY65S for the hihat pad for nearly two years without 
any
> problems. Most of the PCY10's I had are gone. I still have two 
that I
> continue to use as small splash cymbals.
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: DTXpress@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DTXpress@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of geerayman
> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 4:16 PM
> To: DTXpress@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Spam:Re: Spam:[DTXpress] DTXpress III hihat upgrade Q.
> 
>  
> 
> I remember reading one of your posts about your hihat setup. Based 
> on your replies to my other post and this one, I'm now thinking 
that 
> the PCY65S might be the way to go for the hihat rather than a 
Roland 
> CY-5. Is the edge durable enough to withstand lots of shoulder-of-
> the-stick hits?
> 
> Also, I started looking for a PCY-10 to eventually add to the 
> ride "cymbal", but came up with nil. Do you still have one you'd 
be 
> willing for part with for a fair price?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Lito
> 
> --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com <mailto:DTXpress%
40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Damon, Rob" <rdamon@> wrote:
> >
> > You could use the RHH130 (comes with the Special) on a remote 
cable
> > hihat. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Before I upgraded to the Dtxtreme IIS, I used a PCY65S pad on a 
> cymbal
> > arm instead of the TP65 pad for my hihat. There was more give to 
> it. At
> > the time I had two Dtxpress modules and put a PCY10 bell pad on 
> top of
> > the PCY65S pad and through a little cable splitting/combining 
made 
> a
> > true three zone hihat pad (bell/pad/edge) that was controlled by 
a
> > single HH65 pedal. I described this in detail here in the group, 
> but it
> > goes back several years. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > OGD
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > 
> > From: DTXpress@yahoogroups.com <mailto:DTXpress%
40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:DTXpress@yahoogroups.com <mailto:DTXpress%
40yahoogroups.com> ]
> On
> > Behalf Of geerayman
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 12:45 PM
> > To: DTXpress@yahoogroups.com <mailto:DTXpress%40yahoogroups.com> 
> > Subject: Spam:[DTXpress] DTXpress III hihat upgrade Q.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Okay, don't have my DTXpress III yet, but I'm thinking about 
> upgrades 
> > already. I like the rack-mounted hihat pad that comes on the 
> Roland 
> > kits, but I've heard that people have had limited success 
getting 
> them 
> > to function with the DTXIII module. Are there any alternative 
> hihat 
> > pads that I can mount on the rack like the stock one, preferably 
> with 
> > edge triggers? I'd consider the 3-zone TP-65S, but I'm concerned 
> > about the rim wear, plus, it doesn't look like a hihat pad. Even 
> > though the hihat/stand that comes with the III SP probably would 
> be 
> > ideal, I don't want to use a separate hihat stand.
> > 
> > __
> > 
> > 
> > 
> __________________________________________________________
> _
> > The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information 
> intended
> > only for use to the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed. 
> If
> > the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you 
are 
> hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, 
> distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in 
> reliance upon, this information is strictly prohibited. If you 
have 
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender 
and 
> delete the material from your computer.
> > 
> __________________________________________________________
> _
> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security 
> System.
> > For more information please visit 
http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> <http://www.messagelabs.com/email>  
> > 
> __________________________________________________________
> _
> >
> 
>  
> 
_____________________________________________________________________
_
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security 
System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
> 
_____________________________________________________________________
_
> 
> 
> 
_____________________________________________________________________
_
> The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information 
intended
> only for use to the individual or entity to which it is addressed. 
If
> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, 
distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in 
reliance upon, this information is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please contact the sender and 
delete the material from your computer.
> 
_____________________________________________________________________
_
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security 
System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
> 
_____________________________________________________________________
_
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.