Wow, Richard. . . that was quite inspiring to read. Thank you. I'm just coming out of some very serious burnout. For a year and a half I didn't touch my camera. It's the worst I've ever experienced. All that I kept doing was some printing. In December I started to shoot, a little. In January I started to experiment with new papers and inks, and I went a little nuts. I've been feeling guilty about how much I've spent in the last 3 months, but it was almost a compulsion. Now I better understand why. I have one question, perhaps for Tyler. It's something I've wondered for a while. When you print a customer's image, do you modify it, as part of the process to achieve your vision for the print? Best, Terry. On 09/04/10 8:52 PM, "CorrPro96@..." <CorrPro96@...> wrote: > A few years back, Amadou Diallo invited a bunch of us during the Photo Expo > here in NYC to a "Print-Off" of one of his images. It was there that I had > the pleasure of meting a number of the members of this forum and seeing > the results... the printmaking of as many participants as were present, plus > one. The one was Tyler's print, sent to add his input. Only one of the > prints was an ABW... all the others were from dedicated monochrome printers. > Looking at the many versions of the same image, I felt comfortable that my > prints were holding their own, I was surprised and impressed at the quality > of the lone ABW print and found myself learning from the interpretations of > the image in the other prints shown. > When I saw Tyler's print I remember suddenly having the feeling that my > prints sucked. They were fine up to that point, but suddenly looked lifeless. > The detail was there, the feeling was not. We all spent quite a bit of time > discussing Tyler's print, examining the tonal range, the tonal > contrasts.... everything. I don't know what the others thought about > comparing their > work to that print, but that was the beginning of my communicating directly > with Tyler, asking him about his methodology and trying to find out what > the "secret sauce" was. It wasn't the "sauce"... it was his vision, his > previsualization realized that was the difference. > > Gentlemen..... we are all in pursuit of the holy grail in our work, and I > doubt if there are any 3 of us who use the same stuff and work the same way. > I am now printing with a 4880 and ABW, a 7600 with Special Edition K7 and > a Z3100, all making B/W prints. I find the image to be the challenge and I > will use whichever methodology I have, that brings the image to life.... > that gives me the interpretation I want to enjoy. > > We are sometimes our worst critics; we tear up a lot of good expensive ink > and paper.... because 'it sucks', just because we are trying to take our > printmaking to a higher level. We should not take offense in this effort, > when someone is ahead of the curve and trash talks what is going on. > Somewhere > down the line, we ourselves will move to a new plateau and feel exactly > the same way about what we thought was acceptable a few moons ago.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Reply to Jon and Tyler re ABW - Was Aard. Tests
2010-04-10 by Terry Ritz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.