A few questions: You scan your negs as though they were positives. I've read about this, but there seems to be opinion both ways. What's yours? So if saving the adjustments as a template is non-destructive, is there a way to write the template info into files so the adjustments will be incorporated when & if you decide to go the full PS route? Thanks. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Walker Blackwell < forums@...> wrote: > > > For BW, I often do raw (positive) drumscans of BW negs and inverted them in > ACR. Then I import into Lightroom and do most of my global adjustments in > there. I like it because it's non-destructive and faaast! (+ there is no > duplicates. Just the raw scan files with non-destructive crop.) > > + It gives me a more darkroom-esque workflow and I take save all my > adjustments as templates, etc. For straight photography, it works really > well for me. > > Just my two cents, > Walker > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Is Camera Raw enough?
2010-04-14 by Lew Schwartz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.