LR or ACR. Both use the same engine and have the same tools(for the most part)so it really wouldn't make any difference. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, C D Tobie <CDTobie@...> wrote: > > > On Apr 14, 2010, at 3:16 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > > > I'm a bw film photographer & need to learn how to print my scanned > > negs digitally. In CS4, I've discovered that if I open my scanned > > tiff's in Adobe Camera Raw, I can find pretty much all the adjustments > > I need (mostly exposure & contrast) to keep my street look. I then > > save the adjustments, open the file in Photoshop, probably apply a > > gradient & then straight to print. It seems like I'm missing a world > > of Photoshop possibilities, but if I tool around too much in PS, the > > shots look too studied. Is anyone else using the simplified approach? > > Lightroom would be the usual tool for this, and will allow printing as > well, so that, for your uses, Photoshop might be reserved for special > occasions... > > C. David Tobie > Global Product Technology Manager > Digital Imaging & Home Theater > CDTobie@... > > > ---------- > > > > Datacolor > www.datacolor.com/Spyder3 > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Is Camera Raw enough?
2010-04-14 by Keith
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.