Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Scanning b&w negs, revisited

2010-07-04 by E.Neilsen

Keep a log of the workflow and make prints and include the mundane; printer,
version of software, etc. Change a setting, make a test print. However, the
biggest issue that I have seen over the years is that today's workflow may
be quite a bit different that next months or next year. As the screen to
print  matching gets better, the sharpening tools - everything from pre
output, to RIPs and output devices, your interpretation of the data may
change. I believe that this is what has lead to the "non destructive" buzz
word. Early attempts to edit may have been destroying your (our) data. So as
Harry points out, scan big and save it. You might even scan the same image
big with several different key setting changed; USM, - different channels,
CI of your data.  I have gone back to some early conversions of 4x5 B&W negs
that I had RAW scans made of and made much better files to print from the
second time around.  

 

Eric   

 

Eric Neilsen

Eric Neilsen Photography

4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9

Dallas, TX 75226

 

www.ericneilsenphotography.com

skype me with ejprinter

www.ericneilsenphotography.com/forum1

Let's Talk Photography

 

  _____  

.

This also applies to sharpening algorithms. The only way to tell what 
the real effect is, is make prints.
--
Bruce Watson





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.