Keep a log of the workflow and make prints and include the mundane; printer, version of software, etc. Change a setting, make a test print. However, the biggest issue that I have seen over the years is that today's workflow may be quite a bit different that next months or next year. As the screen to print matching gets better, the sharpening tools - everything from pre output, to RIPs and output devices, your interpretation of the data may change. I believe that this is what has lead to the "non destructive" buzz word. Early attempts to edit may have been destroying your (our) data. So as Harry points out, scan big and save it. You might even scan the same image big with several different key setting changed; USM, - different channels, CI of your data. I have gone back to some early conversions of 4x5 B&W negs that I had RAW scans made of and made much better files to print from the second time around. Eric Eric Neilsen Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 www.ericneilsenphotography.com skype me with ejprinter www.ericneilsenphotography.com/forum1 Let's Talk Photography _____ . This also applies to sharpening algorithms. The only way to tell what the real effect is, is make prints. -- Bruce Watson [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Scanning b&w negs, revisited
2010-07-04 by E.Neilsen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.