mrjimbo schreef: > Paul, > Acrylite would just be a brand or type of plexi.. The UV resistance is a plus as it will stop the image from getting faded due to exposure to light.. > Typical non glare material in acrylic or glass has an etched surface. > Plexiglas is the (German) R\ufffdhm (und Haas) brand name for PMMA, PolyMethylMetaAcrylate. The common brand name in the English speaking world was Perspex as coined by ICI, UK, the inventor of that plastic. More brand names exist. For glass etching is a way to achieve non glare, for both glass and PMMA the other choice is a coating layer, either on teh outside or on both sides. Colorant fading indoors happens in more ways than by UV light, visible light is probably the main cause for framed prints whether behind UV cutting glass or normal glass, Other factors are humidity, gas fading and the combination of them all. You will find sufficient information at the Aardenburg site. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst spectral plots of +100 inkjet papers: http://www.pigment-print.com/spectralplots/spectrumviz_1.htm | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] no glass vs. glass vs. plexi: which shows carbon print at its best?
2010-08-29 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.