--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@...> wrote: > > I think an additional note would be that the artificial light we usually use is rather low in UV content. > A couple of years ago the only printer I had working was a Canon 9000. I printed a B/W 8x10 of a dancer that I had photographed with 35mm TriX years before and stuck it in a bookshelf. It's out of direct light altogether. As far as I can tell, it hasn't faded at all. And it's on Dell glossy paper no less, which is all I had available when the notion struck me. Go figure! I loved to photograph that dancer and I'm thrilled each time I look at that print. Harry
Message
[Digital BW] Re: no glass vs. glass vs. plexi: which shows carbon print at its best?
2010-08-30 by HarryB